2019
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Electron Diffraction: The Nanocrystallography Revolution

Abstract: Crystallography of nanocrystalline materials has witnessed a true revolution in the past 10 years, thanks to the introduction of protocols for 3D acquisition and analysis of electron diffraction data. This method provides single-crystal data of structure solution and refinement quality, allowing the atomic structure determination of those materials that remained hitherto unknown because of their limited crystallinity. Several experimental protocols exist, which share the common idea of sampling a sequence of d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
332
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 401 publications
(360 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
(595 reference statements)
2
332
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the relativistic UED demonstrations, the minimum electron beam size on the sample was 300 µm with a 300-µm-diameter condenser aperture, which is still unsuitable for microcrystal electron diffraction (micro ED) or now emerging three-dimensional electron diffraction (3D ED) [32]. In the next challenge, we propose a small condenser aperture (50 µm or less) to collimate the electron beam and then focus it on the sample with nanometer size by the condenser lens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the relativistic UED demonstrations, the minimum electron beam size on the sample was 300 µm with a 300-µm-diameter condenser aperture, which is still unsuitable for microcrystal electron diffraction (micro ED) or now emerging three-dimensional electron diffraction (3D ED) [32]. In the next challenge, we propose a small condenser aperture (50 µm or less) to collimate the electron beam and then focus it on the sample with nanometer size by the condenser lens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, structure determination often demands more than the combination of XRPD and SSNMR. Over the last decade, 3D electron diffraction (3D ED) has been established as an alternative method for ab initio structure determination of nanometre-sized crystals (Gemmi et al, 2019), including complex zeolites and layered silicates (Mugnaioli & Kolb, 2015;Yun et al, 2015). Based on the development of automated electron diffraction tomography (ADT) (Kolb et al, 2007), it is now possible to sample a substantial fraction of the 3D reciprocal lattice of nanocrystals in a relatively short period of time of less than 1 h. At the same time, the applied electron dose is significantly reduced in comparison with classical zone axis electron diffraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystallography has remained an indispensable method for structure determination since its initial demonstration over a century ago (Bragg & Bragg, 1913). Beyond X-ray diffraction, neutron and electron diffraction have contributed important advances to the crystallographic determination of macromolecular structures (Glaeser, 1999;Shi et al, 2013;Gemmi et al, 2019). Recently, an electron crystallography method called microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED) has been developed to obtain high-resolution structures from frozen-hydrated three-dimensional macromolecular crystals (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%