2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
205
1
27

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
205
1
27
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of a suitable material for intraradicular retainers is still controversial and generates discussion in the dental community [2][3][4][5][6] . In addition to retention, one of the important requirements of intraradicular retainers is their effect in terms of homogeneous distribution of stress on the restored assembly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of a suitable material for intraradicular retainers is still controversial and generates discussion in the dental community [2][3][4][5][6] . In addition to retention, one of the important requirements of intraradicular retainers is their effect in terms of homogeneous distribution of stress on the restored assembly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to retention, one of the important requirements of intraradicular retainers is their effect in terms of homogeneous distribution of stress on the restored assembly. Accordingly, fiber reinforced composite (hereon: fiber) posts seem to better fulfill this biomechanical aspect, as they have a Young's modulus similar to dentin 1,[3][4][5] . The fact that these materials are also more biomechanically compatible also contributes to reduce the risk of root fracture [6][7][8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All materials were assumed as homogeneous, isotropic and linearly elastic; except for the glass fiber post (GFP) ( Table 3), which was assumed as orthotropic, homogeneous and linearly elastic (19). GFP was assumed as orthotropic since its mechanical properties are different along the fiber (x) and normal directions (y and z).…”
Section: Properties Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GFP was assumed as orthotropic since its mechanical properties are different along the fiber (x) and normal directions (y and z). Thus, the mechanical characteristics of these materials were represented by the Young modulus in the 3 axes (Ex, Ey, Ez), while Poisson ratio (vxz, vxz, vyz) and shearing modulus (Gxz, Gxz, Gyz) in the orthogonal planes (xy, xz and yz) ( Table 3) (19). All structures of the models were assumed as perfectly joined, which means no failure at bonding and interposition.…”
Section: Properties Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em um estudo utilizando a análise de elementos finitos em duas dimensões foi comprovado que pinos de fibra produzem menor concentração de tensões na dentina radicular circundante à ponta do pino do que os pinos metálicos (118) . Outros estudos tiveram os mesmos resultados (119,120) .…”
Section: Ensaio De Push-outunclassified