3D Finite Element Methods for Modeling MFL Inspection of Pipelines

Katragadda, G.; T., J.; Lord, W.; Sun, Yuzhi; Удпа, Сатиш С.; Удпа, Лалита

doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0383-1_72

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Shannon and Jackson [39] or Rodger et al [40]). The effect of magnetizer velocity on MFL was subsequently simulated in 1992 by Nestleroth and Davis [41] using axisymmetric FEA, followed by works of Katragadda et al [42,43].…”

Section: Mfl(v): Velocity Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Finite Element Method Applied in Electromagnetic NDTE: A Review

Augustyniak

Usarek

2016

J Nondestruct Eval

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper contains an original comprehensive review of finite element analysis (FEA) applied by researchers to calibrate and improve existing and developing electromagnetic non-destructive testing and evaluation techniques, including but not limited to magnetic flux leakage (MFL), eddy current testing, electromagnetic-acoustic transducers (EMATs). Premium is put on the detection and modelling of magnetic field, as the vast majority of ENDT involves magnetic induction, either as a primary variable MFL or a complementary phenomenon (EC, EMATs). FEA is shown as a fit-for-purpose tool to design, understand and optimise ENDT systems, or a Reference for other modelling algorithms. The review intentionally omits the fundamentals of FEA and detailed principles of NDT. Strain-stress FEA applications in NDT, especially in ultrasonography and hole-drilling methodology, deserve as well a separate study.

show abstract

Section: Mfl(v): Velocity Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Finite Element Method Applied in Electromagnetic NDTE: A Review

Augustyniak

Usarek

2016

J Nondestruct Eval

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mechanical damage, in contrast to corrosion, tends to be very small and highly localized. However, the residual stress in the pipeline caused by the mechanical damage affects the magnetic properties of the materials and produces a measurable change in the MFL signals [13,14,15]. Prior work at Batelle and SwRI [16] on detection of mechanical damage using MFL has shown that gouges, dents and metal loss produce fundamentally different signals.…”

Section: Data Maintained By the Us Department Of Transportation (Domentioning

confidence: 99%