2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D gait assessment in young and elderly subjects using foot-worn inertial sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
327
5
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(341 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
327
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, some patients showed huge difficulties to walk (outlier in Figure 7), thereby creating a hardly automatically and reliably segmentable pattern, which does not look as a step anymore. In these cases, the identification pattern used by [13] is likely to be unusable. This underlines the influence of the segmentation process on the results, which is the most sensitive part of the algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, some patients showed huge difficulties to walk (outlier in Figure 7), thereby creating a hardly automatically and reliably segmentable pattern, which does not look as a step anymore. In these cases, the identification pattern used by [13] is likely to be unusable. This underlines the influence of the segmentation process on the results, which is the most sensitive part of the algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, due to an algorithm based on acceleration patterns identification and pelvis displacement estimation, the authors exposed some limitations regarding pathological gait. The second one is the solution proposed by Mariani et al [13], which presents a 3D gait assessment method validated on both young and elderly valid subjects. Using a foot-worn inertial sensor, it uses a complex de-drifting method based on sigmoid-like curve substraction modeled from a p-chip interpolation function (Carlson and Fritsch, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes optimizing sampling frequency [31], sensor calibration (e.g., using in-field procedures [32,33]), eliminating irrelevant information from sensor data (e.g., non-human generated sensor noise) using filters [34], drift correction (e.g., using Fourier-based integration [35] or sequential drift correction [23]), and gravity cancellation (e.g., using Kalman filtering [35] or gradient descent-based algorithms [19]). These procedures usually produce gravity-free kinematic information of the sensing unit, such as the estimated orientation and position.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained sensor data are typically stored locally on the acquisition system with limited capacity. Therefore, data acquisition systems often have cloud-based data transmission capabilities [23]. For maximum usability, wireless transmission is typically employed, e.g., Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or proprietary solutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kevin [11] analyzed a theory, design, and evaluation of a miniature, wireless IMU (Initial Measurement Unit) that precisely measures the dynamics of a golf club used in putting. Mariani [12] described 3D gait assessment in young and elderly subjects using foot-worn inertial sensors. Yujin [13] suggested Upper Body Motion Tracking With Inertial Sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%