2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D geological modeling based on gravitational and magnetic data inversion in the Luanchuan ore region, Henan Province, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Luanchuan ore district is the large porphyry–skarn Mo ore cluster in the East Qinling orogen (Figure 2; Mao et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2012, 2015; Wang, Ma, et al, 2017) and sandwiched by the Miaozi Fault to the north and the Luanchuan Fault to the south. The sedimentary rocks in the Luanchuan area are dominated by the Mesoproterozoic Guandaokou Group, the Meso‐ to Neoproterozoic Kuanping Group, the Neoproterozoic Luanchuan Group, and the Early Palaeozoic Taowan Group.…”
Section: Regional Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Luanchuan ore district is the large porphyry–skarn Mo ore cluster in the East Qinling orogen (Figure 2; Mao et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2012, 2015; Wang, Ma, et al, 2017) and sandwiched by the Miaozi Fault to the north and the Luanchuan Fault to the south. The sedimentary rocks in the Luanchuan area are dominated by the Mesoproterozoic Guandaokou Group, the Meso‐ to Neoproterozoic Kuanping Group, the Neoproterozoic Luanchuan Group, and the Early Palaeozoic Taowan Group.…”
Section: Regional Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The East Qinling–Dabie orogen is an important molybdenum metallogenic belt, hosting >8 Mt Mo and 40 Mo‐related deposits or occurrences, and constitutes >60% of Mo reserves in China (Li & Pirajno, 2017; Mao et al, 2011; Zeng et al, 2013). These Mo deposits are predominantly porphyry or skarn types (Mao et al, 2011; Ni et al, 2015; Pirajno & Zhou, 2015; Wang et al, 2012, 2015, 2017), with some magmatic hydrothermal vein‐type or carbonatite‐hosted deposits (Deng, Santosh, Yao, & Chen, 2014; Deng et al, 2015; Tang et al, 2021a). Within this belt, porphyry Mo deposits formed in a post‐collisional regime (Chen & Li, 2009; Chen, Wang, Li, Yang, & Pirajno, 2017; Li et al, 2012; Yang, Chen, Pirajno, & Li, 2015), which is distinct from traditional porphyry deposits that formed mainly in oceanic subduction–related magmatic arcs (Audétat & Li, 2017; Klemm, Pettke, & Heinrich, 2008; Lawley, Richards, Anderson, Creaser, & Heaman, 2010; Seedorff & Einaudi, 2004a, 2004b; Selby & Creaser, 2001; Selby, Nesbitt, Muehlenbachs, & Prochaska, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariate principal component analysis method is used for determining elemental correlations and elemental paragenesis (Afzal et al, 2010;Davis, 2002;Deng et al, 2007Deng et al, , 2008. PCA method has reduced dimensions and is commonly used in the geochemical studies (Carranza and Hale, 2002;Carranza, 2010;Wang et al, 2011Wang et al, , 2012Wang et al, , 2013Wang et al, , 2014. In this paper, lithogeochemical samples (with 100 m*100m cells) have been processed using PCA method and resulted in 2 factors including Cu-Zn and Mo-As-Pb.…”
Section: -1-geological Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With its continuous development, Three dimensional geological modeling have been widely used in the field of geological exploration, mathematical geology, geophysics, mine surveying, mine geology, graphics, scientific visualization, and engineering applications [2][3][4][5]. it is the basis for the exploration and development of oil and gas resources, and solid mineral resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%