2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.06.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D hierarchical interface-enriched finite element method: Implementation and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This way, for each e i , we use the map between the NURBS parametric space and the physical space. Subsequently, we use the span-wise mapping scheme described in [26] to compute the integrals appearing in (27) and (31). In this approach, the NURBS volumes constructed in an intersected element are directly used to perform the numerical integration of the weak form.…”
Section: Finite Element Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This way, for each e i , we use the map between the NURBS parametric space and the physical space. Subsequently, we use the span-wise mapping scheme described in [26] to compute the integrals appearing in (27) and (31). In this approach, the NURBS volumes constructed in an intersected element are directly used to perform the numerical integration of the weak form.…”
Section: Finite Element Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the additional degrees of freedom (dofs) are introduced along the intersections of the material interfaces with the edges of the non-conforming mesh and linear Lagrangian basis is used as enrichment. This method has recently been extended to NURBS-based Interface-enriched Generalized Finite Method (NIGFEM) [26,27], which incorporates directly into the finite element formulation the NURBS representation of the surfaces defining the material interfaces. Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines (NURBS) [28,29] are used widely in CAD to represent complex geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partition of unity methods (PUM), such as the generalized and extended FEMs (GFEM and XFEM, respectively) enhance the numerical solution by enriching the basis with specially constructed functions to approximate the weakly discontinuous solutions . Recent developments in XFEM and GFEM for material interface problems include the use of adaptive mesh refinement in conjunction with the level‐set method, and the interface‐enriched GFEM . The local enrichment approach was combined with the FCM as presented by Joulaian and Düster for 2‐dimensional problems .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 Recent developments in XFEM and GFEM for material interface problems include the use of adaptive mesh refinement in conjunction with the level-set method, 21,22 and the interface-enriched GFEM. [23][24][25][26][27] The local enrichment approach was combined with the FCM as presented by Joulaian and Düster for 2-dimensional problems. 15 This combination leads to a significant improvement in the convergence rates of the FCM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation becomes particularly challenging for simulating moving boundary problems (e.g., localized corrosion [2] and phase transition [3]), where the evolving geometry of the domain may require the adaptive refinement [4,5] or regeneration of the FE mesh throughout the solution process. Advanced mesh-independent FEMs such as the extended/generalized FEM [6,7] and the hierarchical interface-enriched FEM (HIFEM) [8,9] alleviate this limitation by adding appropriate enrichments to field/gradient discontinuous regions of the solution, which allows the use of FE meshes that are independent of the problem morphology. The combination of the generalized/extended FEM and the level set method has successfully been implemented for simulating moving boundary problems [10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%