2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D imaging and quantification of porosity in electron beam welded dissimilar steel to Fe-Al alloy joints by X-ray tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using XCT technique, Kar et al recently concluded that the application of beam oscillation reduced the porosity content in EB-welded copper-304stainless steel joints [23]. Similar decrease in porosity content with the application of beam oscillation is seen by Dinda et al in the EB welded steel -Fe Al alloy [17]. In this study along with the effect of beam oscillation, effect of weld speed on porosity formation in EB welded Zr-4 joints is studied.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Using XCT technique, Kar et al recently concluded that the application of beam oscillation reduced the porosity content in EB-welded copper-304stainless steel joints [23]. Similar decrease in porosity content with the application of beam oscillation is seen by Dinda et al in the EB welded steel -Fe Al alloy [17]. In this study along with the effect of beam oscillation, effect of weld speed on porosity formation in EB welded Zr-4 joints is studied.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The lowest number of pores (64nos) was found to be in joint-2 prepared using oscillating beam with lower oscillation diameter of 1mm.The average pore diameter for each joint has also been measured, and it was found that the joint-3 possessed coarser pores having largest pore with diameter of 201µm and smallest pore with diameter of 30µm followed by joint-1 (176µm and 16µm, respectively).Out of the three joints, joint-2 had shown the best results with largest and smallest pores having diameter of 121µm and 11µm, respectively. The morphology of each pore was characterized using a sphericity calculation as given in equation-1 [23]. For such calculations, pores having diameter below 10µm were excluded to avoid uncertainty in estimating their actual surface area.…”
Section: Characterization Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to low heat input, very high power density and 3 zero environmental contamination in EBW, the chances of defect formation is less in EBW dissimilar joints [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%