van Horssen P, van Lier MG, van den Wijngaard JP, VanBavel E, Hoefer IE, Spaan JA, Siebes M. Influence of segmented vessel size due to limited imaging resolution on coronary hyperemic flow prediction from arterial crown volume. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 310: H839 -H846, 2016. First published January 29, 2016 doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00728.2015.-Computational predictions of the functional stenosis severity from coronary imaging data use an allometric scaling law to derive hyperemic blood flow (Q) from coronary arterial volume (V), Q ϭ ␣V  . Reliable estimates of ␣ and  are essential for meaningful flow estimations. We hypothesize that the relation between Q and V depends on imaging resolution. In five canine hearts, fluorescent microspheres were injected into the left anterior descending coronary artery during maximal hyperemia. The coronary arteries of the excised heart were filled with fluorescent cast material, frozen, and processed with an imaging cryomicrotome to yield a three-dimensional representation of the coronary arterial network. The effect of limited image resolution was simulated by assessing scaling law parameters from the virtual arterial network at 11 truncation levels ranging from 50 to 1,000 m segment radius. Mapped microsphere locations were used to derive the corresponding relative Q using a reference truncation level of 200 m. The scaling law factor ␣ did not change with truncation level, despite considerable intersubject variability. In contrast, the scaling law exponent  decreased from 0.79 to 0.55 with increasing truncation radius and was significantly lower for truncation radii above 500 m vs. 50 m (P Ͻ 0.05). Hyperemic Q was underestimated for vessel truncation above the reference level. In conclusion, flow-crown volume relations confirmed overall power law behavior; however, this relation depends on the terminal vessel radius that can be visualized. The scaling law exponent  should therefore be adapted to the resolution of the imaging modality. FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE (FFR) has been shown to be a reliable and a widely accepted method to assess whether a coronary artery stenosis is responsible for myocardial ischemia (11). Conceptually, FFR is defined as the hyperemic flow in a vessel with a stenosis relative to the hypothetical hyperemic flow in the undiseased vessel. In practice, FFR is measured invasively as the ratio between pressure distal to a stenosis and aortic pressure, during adenosine-induced hyperemia. This requires passing of a guide wire with a pressure sensor through the stenosis. Despite the reliability of this method, risks of vessel and plaque rupture, procedure time, and costs have inspired the search for new less-invasive alternatives for assessing FFR (18), based on computational methods applied to arterial models obtained from angiography (27) or CT (6). By using experimentally established form-function relationships, coronary flow can be calculated from image-derived morphological data. These relationships are expressed in terms of allometric scaling laws r...