2017
DOI: 10.1038/547038a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D integration advances computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only can this “so-called” rollable electronics (Rotronics) concept facilitate more efficient usage of space in electronic devices but it can also change the face of the computer-processing industry. Indeed, the continuous race toward developing smaller, faster, bigger, better, and more compact consumer electronics has given rise to supercompact 3D-ICs . In this regard, the 3D-IC provides a route to achieve a larger memory cell density within a much smaller spatial area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not only can this “so-called” rollable electronics (Rotronics) concept facilitate more efficient usage of space in electronic devices but it can also change the face of the computer-processing industry. Indeed, the continuous race toward developing smaller, faster, bigger, better, and more compact consumer electronics has given rise to supercompact 3D-ICs . In this regard, the 3D-IC provides a route to achieve a larger memory cell density within a much smaller spatial area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme obviously increases the production time and, therefore, reduces the scalability of the technology. Another limitation with respect to the traditional view of 3D-ICs is related to the low vertical connector density in the devices, which, in turn, significantly compromises the flow of electricity between adjacent layers and thereby the total data transfer volume. , Though the so-called “monolithic integration methodology” (in which additional circuits are deposited onto the previous ones) enables 1000 times more connector density, these integrated architectures still have their fair share of drawbacks in terms of flexibility, production costs, and packing density. , Here, we have set forth some general guidelines in the field for addressing the above-mentioned challenges through a simple and conventional lithographic device-manufacturing scheme onto a rollable lapolose-based paper. To that end, we have demonstrated that the resistance remains the same for the manufactured Rotronic devices during flexing with a slight increase at around 5% after being bent to 150° and 20% after consecutive folds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, logic functions such as inverter, NOR, and NAND are demonstrated using top-gated IGZO VFETs on a 2 inch wafer [87], as shown in Figure 5(a) (right). Despite conventional scalable method by fabricating more parallel devices, the vertical transistors can be integrated in the vertical direction by stacking different devices layer by layer, representing the device-level 3D integration [100,101]. This kind of vertical stacking of unit devices does not consume additional space besides what is needed for a single device at the bottom [75,102].…”
Section: Scalability and 3d Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By stacking microelectromechanical units or integrated circuit units on top of each other and using vertical interconnections between the units, micro-systems can achieve high levels of function and system integration. In addition, micro-systems with 3D integration technology have the advantages of short interconnection circuits, small parasitic capacitance, and inductance [3][4][5][6]. This technology allows membranes or microstructures to be directly fabricated on the handle wafer and for integrated circuits to be fabricated on another wafer, respectively; after that, the wafers are bonded together and are interconnected by 3D integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%