2019
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D landmarks of Craniofacial Imaging and subsequent considerations on superimpositions in orthodontics—The Aarhus perspective

Abstract: Structured Abstract Objective (a) To evaluate intra‐ and inter‐observer reliability in landmarks placement along the three planes of space on cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) data sets; (b) To evaluate whether the reliability of each landmark differs in CBCT scans characterized by two different voxel dimension and quality. Setting and Sample Population A total of 84 scans were used in this study: 49 scans were taken with the NewTom 3G, and 35 scans were taken with the NewTom 5G. The scans were characterize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Landmarks placed on curved structures, such as Gonion, can present greater levels of errors during placement and these errors can differ in the three spatial dimensions 31 . In a 3D evaluation, a higher reliability along the X direction was found for Gonion, whereas this landmark presented poor reliability along the Y and Z directions 32 . In the present study, the landmark placement accuracy was assessed using the root mean square error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Landmarks placed on curved structures, such as Gonion, can present greater levels of errors during placement and these errors can differ in the three spatial dimensions 31 . In a 3D evaluation, a higher reliability along the X direction was found for Gonion, whereas this landmark presented poor reliability along the Y and Z directions 32 . In the present study, the landmark placement accuracy was assessed using the root mean square error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…30 Previous studies in 2D and 3D have demonstrated that landmark placement can present different level of errors in the three spatial dimensions (x, y and z). 31,32 Landmarks placed on curved structures, such as Gonion, can present greater levels of errors during placement and these errors can differ in the three spatial dimensions. 31 In a 3D evaluation, a higher reliability along the X direction was found for Gonion, whereas this landmark presented poor reliability along the Y and Z directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since variations have been found due to the poor description of the reference points. 17 , 19 , 20 Here, the reference points were described three dimensionally on rigid structures to make their marking easier, modifying the way of locating the sella turcica.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique permits accurate 3D images with relatively high resolution and minimal distortion, with visualization of the craniofacial structures in a one-to-one ratio along all the three planes of space [ 28 ]. Therefore, it is possible to reliably identify landmarks and to clearly assess, in 3D, the skeletal and dental changes occurring as a result of treatment, without the inherent error of projections typical of lateral cephalograms and the uncertainty in landmarks selection related to the overlapping of bilateral structures [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%