3D Micro-Crack Propagation Simulation at Enamel/Adhesive Interface Using FE Submodeling and Element Death Techniques

Abstract

This study investigates micro-crack propagation at the enamel/adhesive interface using finite element (FE) submodeling and element death techniques. A three-dimensional (3D) FE macro-model of the enamel/adhesive/ceramic subjected to shear bond testing was generated and analyzed. A 3D micro-model with interfacial bonding structure was constructed at the upper enamel/adhesive interface where the stress concentration was found from the macro-model results. The morphology of this interfacial bonding structure (i.e., resin tag) was assigned based on resin tag geometry and enamel rod arrangement from a scanning electron microscopy micrograph. The boundary conditions for the micro-model were determined from the macro-model results. A custom iterative code combined with the element death technique was used to calculate the micro-crack propagation. Parallel experiments were performed to validate this FE simulation. The stress concentration within the adhesive occurred mainly at the upper corner near the enamel/adhesive interface and the resin tag base. A simulated fracture path was found at the resin tag base along the enamel/adhesive interface. A morphological observation of the fracture patterns obtained from in vitro testing corresponded with the simulation results. This study shows that the FE submodeling and element death techniques could be used to simulate the 3D micro-stress pattern and the crack propagation noted at the enamel/adhesive interface.

Integrating Finite Element Death Technique and Bone Remodeling Theory to Predict Screw Loosening Affected by Radiation Treatment after Mandibular Reconstruction Surgery

“…The definition of “element death” is not to remove elements but to make the element’s stiffness multiply 1.0E-6 (i.e., the rigidity approaches 0) and then perform subsequent analysis. The element birth does not involve actually adding specific elements to the model but constructing a complete model and hiding the birth elements and proliferating a specific element according to the actual needs in the analysis process [ 22 ].…”

“…This study combined bone remodeling theory and finite element death technology to simulate bone necrosis behavior around the fixation screw from radiation treatment after surgery [ 1 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. The accumulation of osteonecrosis in the elements around the fixation screw at different time points can be simulated using different iterative simulation times (denoted as IT_X; X was the number of iterations) [ 22 ]. Observing the bone necrosis accumulation at different time points can roughly identify the micro-crack propagation trend.…”

Comparative analysis of adhesive failure of orthodontic resins: An in vitro mechanical test with the finite element method

“…All of the materials were assumed to be homogeneous, isotropic, and linearly elastic. [15,18,19,22,23] The number of nodes and elements of the metallic bracket model was 541,195 and 344,614, and of the ceramic bracket model was 389,407 nodes and 245,659 elements.…”

Techniques to derive geometries for image-based Eulerian computations

“…While it is often sufficient to assume homogeneity in materials or assign average multiphase properties (as in the mixture formulation approaches) based upon empirical observations, the mechanical response of a material to an applied force can depend strongly on microstructural details that are missed when such simplifications are made. Examples include the initiation of failure at heterogeneities through crack propagation in metals and other materials (Zhang and Feng, 2011; Liu et al ., 2010; Chen et al ., 2006; Duarte et al ., 2001) and the initiation of detonation via localized heat release due to void collapse (Tran and Udaykumar, 2006a, b). In these cases, while the micro- and meso-structures are critical to the appearance of macro-scale phenomena, the geometric complexity of microstructures makes describing them (not to mention computationally modeling their response) difficult, particularly in three dimensions.…”