2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D micromechanical simulation of the mechanical behavior of an in-situ Al3Ti/A356 composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RVEs with different sizes have been considered in previous studies (Ref 13 , 37 ). For example, Ma et al (Ref 37 ) found no significant difference in the tensile stress–strain responses by varying the RVE size from 20 µm to 50 µm.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RVEs with different sizes have been considered in previous studies (Ref 13 , 37 ). For example, Ma et al (Ref 37 ) found no significant difference in the tensile stress–strain responses by varying the RVE size from 20 µm to 50 µm.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RVEs with different sizes have been considered in previous studies [13,33]. For example, Ma et al [33] found no significant difference in the tensile stress-strain responses by varying the RVE size from 20 µm to 50 µm.…”
Section: Geometry and Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RVEs with different sizes have been considered in previous studies [13,33]. For example, Ma et al [33] found no significant difference in the tensile stress-strain responses by varying the RVE size from 20 µm to 50 µm. In this study, an RVE length of 100 µm was considered based on the microstructural features (i.e., average particle size of 15 µm), which can be further explored in the future studies.…”
Section: Geometry and Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome these obstacles, the employment of intermetallic particles with better wettability and strong interfacial bonding with the matrix instead of conventional ceramic particles is one of the most prominent routes for reinforcement of Al alloys [6,7]. Intermetallics like Al3Ti, have lower brittleness and close coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) to aluminum compared to the conventional ceramic components, and they also provide low density, high resistance to oxidation and corrosion, and high strength [8,9]. These properties make Al3Ti intermetallic a competent alternative for light structural applications [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%