2017
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201700551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Miniaturization of Human Organs for Drug Discovery

Abstract: “Engineered human organs” hold promises for predicting the effectiveness and accuracy of drug responses while reducing cost, time, and failure rates in clinical trials. Multiorgan human models utilize many aspects of currently available technologies including self‐organized spherical 3D human organoids, microfabricated 3D human organ chips, and 3D bioprinted human organ constructs to mimic key structural and functional properties of human organs. They enable precise control of multicellular activities, extrace… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
(248 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, as the tumor organoids lost their original arrangement style, it was necessary to develop new technology such as scaffolds, 3D printing technology, and air-liquid interface, which facilitated tumor organoids form similar structures to primary tumor tissues. 3D printing technology had been used to construct an engineered organ, which enabled the organ to complete the spatial arrangement of cells, the composition of ECM, and the multicellular activity [ 103 , 104 ]. In 3D scaffolds, cancer cells and endothelial cells were co-cultured, a vascular structure could be formed by using microfluidic technology [ 105 ].…”
Section: The Deficiency and Prospect Of Cancer Organoid Model For Drumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, as the tumor organoids lost their original arrangement style, it was necessary to develop new technology such as scaffolds, 3D printing technology, and air-liquid interface, which facilitated tumor organoids form similar structures to primary tumor tissues. 3D printing technology had been used to construct an engineered organ, which enabled the organ to complete the spatial arrangement of cells, the composition of ECM, and the multicellular activity [ 103 , 104 ]. In 3D scaffolds, cancer cells and endothelial cells were co-cultured, a vascular structure could be formed by using microfluidic technology [ 105 ].…”
Section: The Deficiency and Prospect Of Cancer Organoid Model For Drumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional approaches to produce cell aggregates, including culturing cell in stirring suspension 11 , round bottom non-adherent plate 12 , by magnetic levitation 13 , and hanging drop 14 , are hampered by the limitations like the variation in spheroids size, cell number, labor-intensive, high-shear force, and difficulties on massive production 15 . Recently, some microfabrication based methods, such as microwell 1618 , microfluidics 19,20 , and microfabricated hanging drop 2123 , have gained lots of attention due to the formation of a large amount of well-controlled aggregates with uniform size, less laborious, and amenable to high throughput screening 24 . However, to produce such platforms, expensive and time-consuming photolithography or micro-molding fabrication is still an indispensable requisite in those methodologies, and thus are closed-source technologies and not a cost-effective way to perform a micro tissue-based assay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organoids can also be generated from patients with various pathological conditions, such as inflammatory bowel disease or from individuals with various genetic backgrounds (Dekkers et al 2013;VanDussen et al 2015). Organoids from individuals with cells of varying genetic make-up opens a plethora of possibilities for designing of idiosyncratic therapies and personalized medicine (reviewed in Park et al 2018;Lehle et al 2019). Nonetheless, there are disadvantages associated with the physical organization of organoids.…”
Section: Structure and Cellular Phenotypes Of Small Intestinal Epithementioning
confidence: 99%