2013
DOI: 10.2118/151585-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Modeling of Fracture Initiation From Perforated Noncemented Wellbore

Abstract: Summary A 3D numerical model of fracture initiation from a perforated wellbore in linear elastic rock is developed, which allows one to determine the fracture-initiation pressure (FIP) and the location and direction of an initial rupture. The model assumes that the fracture initiates at the point at which the local maximal tensile stress exceeds the rock tensile strength. The 3D boundary-element method (BEM) is used for stress analysis. The model aims to predict the location of in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical models traditionally used for simulating hydraulic fracture initiation pressure are based on either linear elastic strength criteria (Hubbert and Willis 1957;Haimson and Fairhust 1967;Hossain et al 2000;Tran et al 2010;Alekseenko et al 2012) or linear elastic fracture mechanics criteria (Weijers 1995;van de Ketterij and de Pater 1999). A few attempts were made to couple elasticity and fluid flow for the case of axial (Garagash and Detournay 1997;Detournay and Carbonell 1997;Bunger et al 2010; Lecampion 2012) and transverse (Lhomme 2005;Lhomme et al 2005; fractures.…”
Section: Hydraulic Fracturing and Propagation Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical models traditionally used for simulating hydraulic fracture initiation pressure are based on either linear elastic strength criteria (Hubbert and Willis 1957;Haimson and Fairhust 1967;Hossain et al 2000;Tran et al 2010;Alekseenko et al 2012) or linear elastic fracture mechanics criteria (Weijers 1995;van de Ketterij and de Pater 1999). A few attempts were made to couple elasticity and fluid flow for the case of axial (Garagash and Detournay 1997;Detournay and Carbonell 1997;Bunger et al 2010; Lecampion 2012) and transverse (Lhomme 2005;Lhomme et al 2005; fractures.…”
Section: Hydraulic Fracturing and Propagation Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over last 20 years, three different approaches not coupled with the fluid flow have been proposed: an approximated analytical approach using the representation of the perforated wellbore as two noninteracting cylindrical cavities, 3D modeling based on the finiteelement method (FEM), and 3D modeling based on the boundary element method (BEM). More detailed descriptions of each one are provided by Alekseenko et al (2012a). The modeling approach used for the current work falls under the last category listed above (i.e., based on BEM).…”
Section: Existing Models Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be done using the multizone BEM developed by Alekseenko et al (2012b), but constructing the numerical algorithm is more complicated with the multizone BEM, and also computations with this method are too slow for the required volume of stress-state calculations. However, the behavior of cased and open holes is different, and it should be addressed.…”
Section: Model Of Cased Wellborementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Details of the models from the former group are provided by Garagash and Detournay (1997), Detournay and Carbonell (1997), Bunger et al (2010), Lecampion (2012), Lhomme (2005), Lhomme et al (2005), and Abbas and Lecampion (2013). An overview of the latter group provided by Alekseenko et al (2012a). The present model is from the group of models not coupled wFith the fluid flow.…”
Section: Current Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%