2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.12.09.519807
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D multiplexed tissue imaging reconstruction and optimized region-of-interest (ROI) selection through deep learning model of channels embedding

Abstract: Tissue-based sampling and diagnosis are defined as the extraction of information from certain limited spaces and its diagnostic significance of a certain object. Pathologists deal with issues related to tumor heterogeneity since analyzing a single sample does not necessarily capture a representative depiction of cancer, and a tissue biopsy usually only presents a small fraction of the tumor. Many multiplex tissue imaging platforms (MTIs) make the assumption that tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing small core … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this partition, we make sure that tiles used for training and testing come from different areas of the tissue, avoiding memorization and eliminating spatial effects on the results. This is in contrast to previous models that either evaluated on adjacent slices from the same tissue or randomly split regions of the same tissue into training and test sets [15, 16, 17, 20]. Overall, the training set had 1,351,680 tiles, the validation set had 388,783 tiles and the test set had 379,142 tiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this partition, we make sure that tiles used for training and testing come from different areas of the tissue, avoiding memorization and eliminating spatial effects on the results. This is in contrast to previous models that either evaluated on adjacent slices from the same tissue or randomly split regions of the same tissue into training and test sets [15, 16, 17, 20]. Overall, the training set had 1,351,680 tiles, the validation set had 388,783 tiles and the test set had 379,142 tiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, these models were evaluated only on slices coming from the same tissue used for training but were mostly unsuccessful generalizing to new tissue samples [15, 16, 17]. A very recent article proposed a virtual staining model to map H&E into virtual CyCIF stains [19], but only evaluated on slides coming from the same tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These types of approaches either require exceptionally thin sections, do not incorporate the full molecular profiles of the cells, or do not perform unified single-cell level analysis 8,19,21,22 . Furthermore, our previous work reported natural variations between serial sections in the image-to-image translation task, especially when using adjacent H&E sections to infer immunofluorescence intensity 18,20 . Recent platforms such as RareCyte Orion 16 or studies 23 are prioritizing multimodal assays such as CyCIF and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or high-plex protein combined with whole transcriptome sequencing in the same section to address this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%