2018
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D phase contrast MRI in models of human airways: Validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations of steady inspiratory flow

Abstract: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1400-1409.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding Reynolds numbers ( Re = UD / ν ) of the LF and HF cases are Re = 350 and 2000, respectively. The flow velocities in the patient‐specific 3D printing model were measured by the flow‐sensitised phase contrast MRI technique . Three‐dimensional flow MRI measurements were performed on a 3 T MRI scanner (Philips, Ingenia, The Netherlands) with a multichannel cardiac coil during a constant flow of water ( Q L ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding Reynolds numbers ( Re = UD / ν ) of the LF and HF cases are Re = 350 and 2000, respectively. The flow velocities in the patient‐specific 3D printing model were measured by the flow‐sensitised phase contrast MRI technique . Three‐dimensional flow MRI measurements were performed on a 3 T MRI scanner (Philips, Ingenia, The Netherlands) with a multichannel cardiac coil during a constant flow of water ( Q L ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last years, computational models have been used to better understand those interactions. Anatomically based three-dimensional (3D) lung models have elegantly simulated lung tissue mechanics [79] and 3D fluid dynamics in large airways [1012], but without specific focus on the ventilation and gas transport in the entire lung in the context of MBW. More simplified models have addressed these phenomena, but either have not included physiological asymmetries in lung morphology, or have not modeled the whole lung [1323].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation coefficient values we report here ( r ~ 0.6 and above) for the spatial pixel-by-pixel correlation of PC MRI and CFD in v AP and v FH are similar, though slightly lower than those reported for in vitro experiments with hyperpolarized 3 He gas MRI [ 40 ] and water ( 1 H) MRI ( v FH r >0.95 for central airway tree, or r = 0.86 ( r 2 = 0.74) when including upper airways) [ 41 ] in airway casts, and in vivo hyperpolarized 3 He MRI in rats (where for v FH r = 0.82 ( r 2 = 0.68) over the whole of the airways) [ 39 ]. Differences may be attributed to the lower MR signal attainable with 129 Xe compared to 3 He and 1 H, and also the intrinsic advantages of in vitro studies or in vivo studies in mechanically-ventilated animals; (i) the SNR is typically greater (often resulting from increased scan duration and/or signal averaging), (ii) flow rates can be better controlled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%