2021
DOI: 10.3390/act10120335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D-Printed Miniature Robots with Piezoelectric Actuation for Locomotion and Steering Maneuverability Applications

Abstract: The miniaturization of robots with locomotion abilities is a challenge of significant technological impact in many applications where large-scale robots have physical or cost restrictions. Access to hostile environments, improving microfabrication processes, or advanced instrumentation are examples of their potential use. Here, we propose a miniature 20 mm long sub-gram robot with piezoelectric actuation whose direction of motion can be controlled. A differential drive approach was implemented in an H-shaped 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on the galumphing and slipping motions, we propose a lightweight multimodal crawling robot. Within the realm of small‐scale planar crawlers, the key performance metrics include mass, speed, and power source, as depicted in Figure 5I 1‐8,10‐13,17,19,22‐44 . Soft‐crawling robots are predominantly externally powered and can weigh as little as 0.9 g. [ 19 ] Conversely, many rigid crawling robots utilize battery power and can weigh as little as 1.7 g. [ 2 ] The GASR possesses a light weight of 1.2 g and an average speed of 1.1 BL s −1 , nearly rivaling externally powered robots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drawing on the galumphing and slipping motions, we propose a lightweight multimodal crawling robot. Within the realm of small‐scale planar crawlers, the key performance metrics include mass, speed, and power source, as depicted in Figure 5I 1‐8,10‐13,17,19,22‐44 . Soft‐crawling robots are predominantly externally powered and can weigh as little as 0.9 g. [ 19 ] Conversely, many rigid crawling robots utilize battery power and can weigh as little as 1.7 g. [ 2 ] The GASR possesses a light weight of 1.2 g and an average speed of 1.1 BL s −1 , nearly rivaling externally powered robots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the realm of small‐scale planar crawlers, the key performance metrics include mass, speed, and power source, as depicted in Figure 5I . 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 17 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 Soft‐crawling robots are predominantly externally powered and can weigh as little as 0.9 g. [ 19 ] Conversely, many rigid crawling robots utilize battery power and can weigh as little as 1.7 g. [ 2 ] The GASR possesses a light weight of 1.2 g and an average speed of 1.1 BL s −1 , nearly rivaling externally powered robots. Furthermore, robots employing unstable galumphing and vibration‐based slipping are located within the red and blue regions of the performance space, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the CNC machining method is difficult to process some special microstructures, which cannot meet the further miniaturization and special design requirements of MPRs. Then, some new fabrication methods are applied to MPRs with miniature and special structure designs, mainly including additive manufacturing (AM) method [ 219 , 220 , 221 ] and smart composite microstructure (SCM) method, [ 222 , 223 , 224 ] as shown in Figure 11 a . The AM method, also referred to as 3D printing method, has the unique advantages for the cost‐effective fabrication of complicated 3D geometries with multiple materials at multiple scales.…”
Section: Manufacturing Methods and Materials For Mprsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These actuators require smaller, lighter, and larger deformations. Many types of actuators exist, e.g., piezoelectric actuators using the inverse piezoelectric effect [6,7], shape memory alloy actuators using the shape memory effect [8,9], and bimetallic actuators using the difference in thermal deformation [10]. In all these, it is difficult to obtain a large self‐generated deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%