2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Printed Patient Specific Models from Medical Imaging - A General Workflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we used 0.5 mm thickness images, and the postprocessing was made by radiologists as suggested by Akmal et al [ 18 ] and Huotilainen et al [ 19 ], ensuring that the interpretation of the images matches the 3D printed model and the structures are being well-differentiated from imaging modality artifacts. For postprocessing, we used 3D Slicer, an open-source software [ 7 ] that has been found to be suitable for segmentation as well as in other studies with 3D printing [ 15 , 20 ] because it is free and certified for medical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, we used 0.5 mm thickness images, and the postprocessing was made by radiologists as suggested by Akmal et al [ 18 ] and Huotilainen et al [ 19 ], ensuring that the interpretation of the images matches the 3D printed model and the structures are being well-differentiated from imaging modality artifacts. For postprocessing, we used 3D Slicer, an open-source software [ 7 ] that has been found to be suitable for segmentation as well as in other studies with 3D printing [ 15 , 20 ] because it is free and certified for medical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models were printed using a UV-LCD printer with a higher quality resolution and a good surface finishing ( Figure 4 ) compared to FDM (Fused Deposition Modelling) technology mainly used in other aneurysm printing studies [ 15 , 20 ]. We also had a very good time interval (a mean of 3 h) from data acquisition to the completed model compared with Błaszczyk et al who disclosed a time-lapse of approximately 4 h [ 21 ] or Faraj et al who disclosed a time-lapse of 24 to 28 h [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, several -academic and commercial -workflow pipelines have been adapted and optimized for outer ear replicas [33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. These applications focus on cost effectiveness based on estimated price/piece values, time expenditure and quality of end-products.…”
Section: Basic Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this process, a successive series of bidimensional images is modeled using computer-aided design (CAD) software and subsequently used to create a digital model which serves to generate a 3D object whose geometry and shape are accurate [62]. To develop a patient-specific device via additive manufacturing, the process usually comprises four consecutive steps: (i) image acquisition, (ii) image partition or segmentation, (iii) adjustment of a 3D-model, and (iv) printing of the 3D-model [63]. Images are usually acquired using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approaches, following precise and specific parameters.…”
Section: Overview Of 3d-printing Technology For Biomedical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%