2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13122700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D-Printing for Transformation Optics in Electromagnetic High-Frequency Lens Applications

Abstract: This article presents the design, construction and analysis of a 3D-printed transformed hyperbolic flat lens working on the 30 GHz band. The transformed lens was printed using only one ABS dielectric filament of relative permittivity of 12, varying the infill percentage of each transformed lens section in order to achieve the permittivity values obtained with the transformation optics. The 3D-printed hyperbolic transformed lens exhibits good radiation performance compared to the original canonical lens.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purposes of the current study, we used a commercially available Makerbot Replicator 2x; a FDM printer; and two different, commercially available filaments as printing materials, i.e., the polylactic acid (PLA) and the Electrifi. Notably, 3D printing has been already used in fabrication of dielectric microwave metamaterials and components [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ], and the conductive filaments have been also recently examined [ 40 , 41 ]. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that such a combination has been used for SRRs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of the current study, we used a commercially available Makerbot Replicator 2x; a FDM printer; and two different, commercially available filaments as printing materials, i.e., the polylactic acid (PLA) and the Electrifi. Notably, 3D printing has been already used in fabrication of dielectric microwave metamaterials and components [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ], and the conductive filaments have been also recently examined [ 40 , 41 ]. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that such a combination has been used for SRRs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, by varying the infill percentage of the unit-cell, we retrieve the different dispersion diagrams, and therefore, the relative permittivity for each infill percentage variation. This unit-cell has proved to represent the infill percentage accurately and the relative permittivity obtained with the 3D-printing process [16], [17]. Figure 5 shows the unit-cell and the relative permittivity values as a function of the infill percentage obtained with this analysis for the filament PREPERM ABS1000 (ε r = 10).…”
Section: A Proposed Topologies For Parametric Studymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…One of the main drawbacks of this technology is the limitation of available permittivity values on standard dielectric materials and that the complexity of the shape either increases the manufacturing cost or is limited by current manufacturing processes. This shape issue can be easily overcome by using 3D-printing, which allows the manufacture of different shapes, only depending on the precision of the printer, while for the permittivity values, we can obtain different dielectric constants just by varying the infill percentage of the 3D-printed dielectric [16], [17], [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most feasible way of construction and design is therefore as stacked perforated dielectric substrates similarly as in [31]. Another construction options are generally based on an additive manufacturing, where the building unit-cells can be of various shapes as cubes (Polymer Jetting -PJ) [32], cuboid grid (Fused Decomposition Modeling -FDM) [33] or 3D crosses (Stereolithography -SLA) [34]. However, it is hard to realize such structures at mm-waves above 80 GHz because of the xy resolution limit of the conventional 3D printers for reliable printing (FDM ≈ 0.4 mm depending on the print nozzle diameter [35], SLA ≈ 0.15 mm depending on the laser spot size [36]), and the requirement for supporting structures, which are too difficult to remove.…”
Section: ( )mentioning
confidence: 99%