2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
290
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
290
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The gold standard for bone restoration still generally is autogenous bone grafts that are harvested from intra-or extra-oral sites; however, this has the limitation of low graft quantity, donor site morbidity, and infection. Although many researchers have made attempts to develop therapeutic approaches for the fabrication of human bone [121,123,124] as a highly ordered and vascularized tissue [125], few have succeeded in which there is still no effective treatment for most cases [126][127][128]. As a result, bone tissue engineering (BTE) undergoes a booming advancement as the alternative to bone grafting, where graft substitutes are made using biomaterials to replace or repair damaged bone defects [125].…”
Section: Skinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gold standard for bone restoration still generally is autogenous bone grafts that are harvested from intra-or extra-oral sites; however, this has the limitation of low graft quantity, donor site morbidity, and infection. Although many researchers have made attempts to develop therapeutic approaches for the fabrication of human bone [121,123,124] as a highly ordered and vascularized tissue [125], few have succeeded in which there is still no effective treatment for most cases [126][127][128]. As a result, bone tissue engineering (BTE) undergoes a booming advancement as the alternative to bone grafting, where graft substitutes are made using biomaterials to replace or repair damaged bone defects [125].…”
Section: Skinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different biomaterials, hydrogels are considered as promising materials for BTE due to their physical or structural similarity to natural tissues; however, hydrogels often suffer from poor mechanical properties specially in BTE applications [129]. By reviewing the available literature, it can be observed that some researchers have concentrated on the requirements for bioinks in 3D-printed bone scaffolds [121,123,130] . For instance, Turnbull and coworkers [131] critically focused on materials and barriers to clinical translation.…”
Section: Skinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, many naturally derived polymers are used in current studies for the preparation of scaffolds by 3D printing due to the large potential in biomedical applications, particularly the replacement and regeneration of cells, tissues, or organs [ 27 , 28 , 29 ]. Various studies have been conducted in this field using different formulations of collagens, alginates, and chitosan, as these materials are well-known natural sources of polymers [ 30 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To induce bone regeneration, porous scaffolds with appropriate shape, pore size, porosity, degradability, biocompatibility, mechanical properties and desirable cellular responses are required. 3D printing has revealed to be very useful in this field, thanks to the capability to process complex shapes with a wide variety of biocompatible materials such as poly(l-lactic acid) (PLLA), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) starting from filaments and pellets [ 27 ]. In this study we investigate the combination of Res and Pol treatment and 3D-printed polycarbonate (PC) scaffolds to study the possible effects of this set-up on MSCs commitment into the osteoblastic lineage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%