2015
DOI: 10.1117/12.2075655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D puzzle reconstruction for archeological fragments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained in section 3.1, we devised our model in order to work with an imbalanced DS (when undersampling was not used), therefore in order to show the effectiveness of the adopted technique we used two kinds of classification metrics: the balanced accuracy and the macro F1 score. The first one is defined as the average of recall obtained on each class 8 , while the second one calculates metrics for each label and finds their unweighted mean 9 . Thus, macro F1 is defined as follows:…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As explained in section 3.1, we devised our model in order to work with an imbalanced DS (when undersampling was not used), therefore in order to show the effectiveness of the adopted technique we used two kinds of classification metrics: the balanced accuracy and the macro F1 score. The first one is defined as the average of recall obtained on each class 8 , while the second one calculates metrics for each label and finds their unweighted mean 9 . Thus, macro F1 is defined as follows:…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both [7,8] deal with the reconstruction of broken artifacts by using a 3D acquisition set-up, transforming the objects into point clouds without the aid of neural networks. In particular, the first work aims to find the individual rigid transformations that better align all the fragments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most publications of this field rely on the border irregularities and aim for precise alignment. They focus on automated reconstruction, such as [8,9,10] and consider jigsaw puzzle solving with missing fragments or with differently sized tiles [11,12,13]. These methods perform well on a small dataset with only one source of fragments.…”
Section: Puzzle Solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether it comes to precisely align fragments or approximate a relative position, archaeological object reconstruction attracts numerous researchers, as shown by Rasheed and Nordin in [2,3]. When most reassembly work is based on semi-automated methods, some stands out by the use of automated reconstruction, such as [4,5,6,7]. These are mainly inspired by the research on puzzle solving, especially on jigsaw puzzles [8,9,10,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%