2016
DOI: 10.3844/ajbbsp.2016.253.262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D-QSAR and SVM Prediction of BRAF-V600E and HIV Integrase Inhibitors: A Comparative Study and Characterization of Performance with a New Expected Prediction Performance Metric

Abstract: Abstract:The results of directly comparing the prediction accuracy of optimized 3D Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (3D-QSAR) models and linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers to identify small molecule inhibitors of the BRAF-V600E and HIV Integrase targets are reported. Performance comparisons were carried out using 303 compounds (68 active) against BRAF-V600E and 204 compounds (159 active) against HIV Integrase. A SVM prediction accuracy of 95% (BRAF-V600E) and 100% (HIV Integrase) and 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, our StackBRAF has 11–100 times larger training and 6–77 times larger test datasets than those of previous studies. The StackBRAF demonstrated the highest goodness of fit in the CV test ( Q 2 CV ) compared to the four previous studies. StackBRAF also exhibits better predictability ( Q 2 Ext ) than the three previous studies of the 3D-QSAR model. Overall, our StackBRAF model offers improved predictability, robustness, and applicability across a wide range of chemical molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison, our StackBRAF has 11–100 times larger training and 6–77 times larger test datasets than those of previous studies. The StackBRAF demonstrated the highest goodness of fit in the CV test ( Q 2 CV ) compared to the four previous studies. StackBRAF also exhibits better predictability ( Q 2 Ext ) than the three previous studies of the 3D-QSAR model. Overall, our StackBRAF model offers improved predictability, robustness, and applicability across a wide range of chemical molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Most of them utilized 3D descriptors calculated from comparative molecular force field and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis models. They also applied the PLS as a regression model with steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic, and hydrogen bonding between the drug and target as molecular descriptors. The training datasets of previous studies included 27–243 compounds, while the test datasets comprised 15–189 compounds. In comparison, our StackBRAF has 11–100 times larger training and 6–77 times larger test datasets than those of previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By introduction of large datasets, the more sophisticated methods were employed to make predictive QSAR models: SVM, RF, and ANN with different architectures including DL. One of the successful applications of the SVM is the prediction of the activity of HIV integrase inhibitors (Leonard et al, 2016). Sometimes RF and usually DL outperform other methods in the model development for large datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%