2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D-simulation of lunar megaregolith evolution: Quantitative constraints on spatial variation and size of fragment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this early bombardment likely engendered an early Mercury megaregolith analogous to the lunar counterpart (Liu et al 2022). Consequently, we propose a novel potential atmospheric source-the sudden degasification of this primordial megaregolith.…”
Section: Deciphering the Genesis And Evolution Of Mercury'smentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In addition, this early bombardment likely engendered an early Mercury megaregolith analogous to the lunar counterpart (Liu et al 2022). Consequently, we propose a novel potential atmospheric source-the sudden degasification of this primordial megaregolith.…”
Section: Deciphering the Genesis And Evolution Of Mercury'smentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Our impact mixing model, which allows for tracing the evolution of material age distribution with long-term bombardment, has been applied to different components such as impact melt, mare/highland materials, and different-sized fragments (Liu et al 2020a(Liu et al , 2020b(Liu et al , 2022b. In this study, we focus on the impact melt but take different scenarios of the early bombardment rate into account.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bulk density and strength for the lower intact bedrock are selected as: ρ l = 3,200 kg/m 3 (Kiefer et al, 2012) and Y l = 20 Mpa (Asphaug et al, 1996), respectively. The thickness of the fractured bedrock layer at the end of our 3.5 Gyr simulations is determined by scaling the upper megaregolith thickness of 2.5 km inferred to have formed primarily from 4.31 to 3.8 Ga by Liu et al (2022). This gives fractured bedrock thicknesses of 246 and 192 m for the nonconstant and constant impact flux models respectively (see Text S4 in Supporting Information S1 for detail).…”
Section: Parameter Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%