2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D spatial organization and network-guided comparison of mutation profiles in Glioblastoma reveals similarities across patients

Abstract: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive type of brain tumor. Molecular heterogeneity is a hallmark of GBM tumors that is a barrier in developing treatment strategies. In this study, we used the nonsynonymous mutations of GBM tumors deposited in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and applied a systems level approach based on biophysical characteristics of mutations and their organization in patient-specific subnetworks to reduce inter-patient heterogeneity and to gain potential clinically relevant insi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preferential localization to the rim regions, which consists of polar and charged solvent-exposed residues, is only observed in the COSMIC dataset for the globular interactions. However, this observation is consistent with the previously reported tendency for cancer mutations to disrupt PPIs through substituting charged residues and perturbing the electrostatic component of binding affinities [11,79]. The most exciting finding of the analysis with the entire COSMIC SNV data is that the cores of interacting IDRs have the highest, statistically significant ORs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Preferential localization to the rim regions, which consists of polar and charged solvent-exposed residues, is only observed in the COSMIC dataset for the globular interactions. However, this observation is consistent with the previously reported tendency for cancer mutations to disrupt PPIs through substituting charged residues and perturbing the electrostatic component of binding affinities [11,79]. The most exciting finding of the analysis with the entire COSMIC SNV data is that the cores of interacting IDRs have the highest, statistically significant ORs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The localization patterns of COSMIC mutations in globular and IDR-partner tumor suppressors suggests that disruption of PPIs is also a deactivating mechanism. In contrast, the generally activating cancer-associated mutations in oncoproteins tend to be less destabilizing and more site-specific [79], which is reflected in the higher ORs in the protein surface and interface rim regions of the globular interaction set. Interestingly, the interface regions of IDR-partner oncoproteins have no statistically significant enrichment in cancer-associated mutations, which contrast the finding for globular oncoproteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nevertheless, spatial and temporal heterogeneity is a critical challenge that the neuro-oncology field must address before precision oncology can be considered a viable option for brain tumor patients (62,69,179,180). Spatial heterogeneity in GBM resected tumors is recognized in transcriptional atlases, where genomic alterations and gene expression patterns vary between the leading edge, infiltrating tumor, cellular tumor, pseudopalisading cells around necrosis, and microvascular proliferation regions (69).…”
Section: Precision Oncology For Gliomas: Targeting Spatial Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonsynonymous single nucleotide variations have been associated with diseases (Hindorff et al, 2009; Manolio et al, 2008) due to their effects, such as perturbing biological processes and impairing molecular functions of proteins by changing their stability or interactions (Fariselli, et al, 2015; Datta et al, 2015; Farh et al, 2015; Halushka et al, 1999; Hindorff et al, 2009; Khurana et al, 2016; Presnyak et al, 2015; Sauna and Kimchi-Sarfaty 2011; Supek et al, 2014; Zwart et al, 2018; Dincer et al, 2019). Interpreting the effect of variations is important for understanding diseases of genetic origin, proposing effective treatment strategies, and developing novel biotechnological products (Dincer et al, 2019). High-throughput technologies have been producing vast amounts of variation data that awaits interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%