2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D stationary simulation of a turning operation with an Eulerian approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Eulerian method takes a smaller amount of computation time, however, chip separation conditions and angle due to shearing action need to be defined earlier before simulation. 37 Form and dimensional features of chip are tough to predict while micromachining of titanium alloy. To overcome these issues, in this work, finite-element simulation is performed through implicit Lagrangian formulation.…”
Section: Fem Modelling and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Eulerian method takes a smaller amount of computation time, however, chip separation conditions and angle due to shearing action need to be defined earlier before simulation. 37 Form and dimensional features of chip are tough to predict while micromachining of titanium alloy. To overcome these issues, in this work, finite-element simulation is performed through implicit Lagrangian formulation.…”
Section: Fem Modelling and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Eulerian method can perfectly solve the element deformation problems but it also has disadvantages. The chip shape needs to be known ahead of time, and the elastic behavior of the material is not considered, making the simulation of machining-induced residual stress not possible [5]. Therefore, Eulerian method is gradually replaced by other methods in cutting simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [14] and Tzotzis et al [15] simulated the cutting force of multiple sequential cuts in turning process, which is achieved by introducing the surface state after the previous cutting into the next cutting model as initial cutting condition [16]. Girinon et al [5] applied 3D Eulerian model to obtain the temperature distribution during cutting process of H13A material. Arrazola et al [17] simulated hard turning process through the 3D ALE model, and predicted the residual stress state of AISI 52100 steel on machined surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] 1-50 β 1 0.9-0.98 [34] (or even 1) for many commercially available FEM software such as Deform, AdvantEdge or Forge NXT [8,[22][23][24] . For instance, Mathieu et al [25] and Cuesta et al [26] included this coefficient in their thermal analysis of different manufacturing processes. In contrast, other researchers defined the adiabatic self-heating as the ratio between the heat experimentally observed via thermal variations to the total plastic work done [27][28][29] , called as β 2 in this research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%