2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1661-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D structural complexity analysis of cerebellum in Chiari malformation type I

Abstract: Chiari malformation type I (CM-I), described by a descent of the cerebellar tonsils, is assumed to be a neurological developmental disorder. The aim of the present study was to investigate morphological variance in cerebellar sub-structures, including gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), using magnetic resonance (MR) images with three-dimensional (3D) fractal dimension (FD) analysis in patients with CM-I. MRI data of 16 patients and 15 control subjects were obtained, and structur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fractal dimensions of different layers of the cerebellar cortex also were not determined individually. In the studies [2,17] the FD values of the gray matter also exceed the corresponding values of the white matter, which corresponds to results of the present study. The values of 3D fractal dimension exceed the values obtained in the present study, because the threedimensional FD can vary from 2 to 3 and theoretically always exceeds the two-dimensional FD, which has a value from 1 to 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Fractal dimensions of different layers of the cerebellar cortex also were not determined individually. In the studies [2,17] the FD values of the gray matter also exceed the corresponding values of the white matter, which corresponds to results of the present study. The values of 3D fractal dimension exceed the values obtained in the present study, because the threedimensional FD can vary from 2 to 3 and theoretically always exceeds the two-dimensional FD, which has a value from 1 to 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The difference between the average values of fractal dimension obtained in the study [1] and in the present study may be due to the difference in the number of studied objects, differences in algorithms of the image preprocessing and segmentation and difference in methods of fractal analysis (box counting and pixel dilation, respectively). In other works, the values of 3D fractal dimension of the white and gray matter of the cerebellum were determined [2,17]. The average values of 3D fractal dimension of the white matter were 2.26±0.05 [2] and 2.2746±0.0446 [17] and the average values 3D fractal dimension of the gray matter were 2.49±0.04 [2] and 2.5267 ± 0.0228 [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations