67th EAGE Conference &Amp; Exhibition 2005
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.1.a028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Surface-Related Multiple Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main objective is to uncover primaries masked by strong multiple events using a multiple model. The 3D-SRME model [31] shown in Figures 2b and 3b achieves good precision on the near and mid offset range. We compare the proposed method based on 1D complex unary filters in wavelet domain, with reference algorithms based on standard 1D and 2D adaptive filters.…”
Section: Unary Filter Estimation: Amplitude and Delaymentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main objective is to uncover primaries masked by strong multiple events using a multiple model. The 3D-SRME model [31] shown in Figures 2b and 3b achieves good precision on the near and mid offset range. We compare the proposed method based on 1D complex unary filters in wavelet domain, with reference algorithms based on standard 1D and 2D adaptive filters.…”
Section: Unary Filter Estimation: Amplitude and Delaymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The second approach includes prediction filters and variations thereof [38,1,37], also termed identification, updating, shaping, sequential or matching filters in electrical engineering literature [33] or predictive deconvolution [40]. Recently, modeling based techniques, such as surface-related multiple estimation (SRME), have demonstrated excellent performance, allowing data-driven multiple removal [45,50,23] or model-driven, wave-equation based, multiple removal [31,51]. These methods, based on multiple models, consist in predicting then subtracting multiple events from original seismic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the data is convolved with itself as a first estimate of the primary wave field. The latter utilizes a wave field modeling technique where the multiple wave field is constructed shot by shot by convolution with a primary or reflectivity model (Pica, et al, 2005).…”
Section: D Srme (Surface Related Multiple Elimination)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all these reasons the wavefield extrapolation approach (Berryhill and Kim 1986;Wiggins 1988;Kabir, Abma and Xia 2004) is still a useful alternative as pointed out by Stork et al (2006). Pica et al (2005) showed that all surface multiples can be predicted by using accurate 3D models of subsurface reflectivity and velocity. While in SRME multiples are predicted by adding one round trip through the subsurface, using the data themselves as the extrapolation operator, in wavefield extrapolation methods the round trip is added by explicit wavefield computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%