2017
DOI: 10.1530/erp-16-0041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D transoesophageal echocardiography in the TAVI sizing arena: should we do it and how do we do it?

Abstract: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was initially proven as an alternative to valve replacement therapy in those beyond established risk thresholds for conventional surgery. With time the technique has been methodically refined and offered to a progressively lower risk cohort, and with this evolution has come that of the significant imaging requirements of valve implantation. This review discusses the role of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in the current TAVI arena, aligning it with that of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 13 ] Due to the difference between the sizes of aortic valve 3 leaflets, the use of 2D-TTE imaging in assessing aortic annulus based on the distance between 2 valvular hinge points on a 2D-TTE image will give an inaccurate measurement. [ 14 ] Therefore, many investigators tend to use 3D-TTE imaging techniques, which give more accurate measurements during the examination. [ 15 ] Thus, the present study was designed to compare 2D-TTE and 3D-TTE measurements of the aortic annular diameter using MDCT as a gold standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 13 ] Due to the difference between the sizes of aortic valve 3 leaflets, the use of 2D-TTE imaging in assessing aortic annulus based on the distance between 2 valvular hinge points on a 2D-TTE image will give an inaccurate measurement. [ 14 ] Therefore, many investigators tend to use 3D-TTE imaging techniques, which give more accurate measurements during the examination. [ 15 ] Thus, the present study was designed to compare 2D-TTE and 3D-TTE measurements of the aortic annular diameter using MDCT as a gold standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annulus itself is more intricate than appreciated on 2D and, in relation to TAVR measurements, is not actually an anatomical structure but virtual, an imagined ring tracing the basal cusp hinge points. 4 It is also usually oval, with the shortest cross-sectional diameter in the sagittal TEE plane and the longest diameter in the coronal plane. This results in almost unavoidable underestimation of annular size by 2D TEE which is based on sagittal measurements for both the annulus and LVOT.…”
Section: Annulus Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25][26] At least some of this difference may be related to the lower spatial resolution of 3D TEE at the time, image dropout secondary to significant calcification at the annulus or aortic valve, and center experience. 27 Notably, heavy aortic calcification limits 3D TEE evaluation of planimetry and annulus measurements due to image dropout. TEE with 3D and automated software (see Figure 3C), may ultimately provide pre-TAVR patients with 'one-stop shopping' for the evaluation of the entire aortic apparatus with excellent temporal and good spatial resolution, while avoiding contrast and radiation.…”
Section: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%