2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D ultrasound vs 3D sonohysterography in the diagnosis of uterine anomalies: a prospective blinded study of 600 consecutive infertility patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3D adds value to 2D SHG by improving with visualization of the uterine fundus [ 47 ]. Others suggest that when the SHG is performed by an experienced examiner, 3D does not add additional value to the 2D SHG [ 48 ].…”
Section: D Vs 3d Shgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D adds value to 2D SHG by improving with visualization of the uterine fundus [ 47 ]. Others suggest that when the SHG is performed by an experienced examiner, 3D does not add additional value to the 2D SHG [ 48 ].…”
Section: D Vs 3d Shgmentioning
confidence: 99%