3D ultrasound vs Sonohysterography for the diagnosis of uterine anomalies: A prospective blinded study of 1000 consecutive women

Hartman, A.; Hartman, Michael; Hartman, J.; Tur-Kaspa, Ilan

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.165

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As we did not find any association between the endometrial thickness on the day of ET and the outcome of pregnancy, we evaluated whether it would be possible to identify a better prognostic section point in the patients who became pregnant that was not conclusive. Hartman et al (2005) randomly evaluated the endometrium via transvaginal on the day of ET and established groups with thickness <8 mm, 8-12 mm, and >12 mm. They observed greater pregnancy rates in the endometrium >12 mm and considered canceling ET and cryopreserving the embryos, when the endometrium was <7 mm.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Endometrial thickness assessment at embryo transfer in ICSI cycles using GnRH antagonists

Cardoso¹,

Souza²,

Mancebo³

et al. 2009

JBRA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Endometrial thickness assessment at embryo transfer in ICSI cycles using GnRH antagonists

Cardoso¹,

Souza²,

Mancebo³

et al. 2009

JBRA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sonografie scheint die Möglichkeiten, uterine Anomalien zu diagnostizieren, nochmals deutlich zu verbessern und kann in Abhängigkeit von der Erfahrung des Untersuchers ähnliche Ergebnisse wie die invasive Hysteroskopie liefern[7,8]. Die Kombination von 3-D-Sonografie und Kontrastmittel führt zu einer nahezu 100 %igen Detektionsrate intrakavitärer Pathologien und ist somit als der Hysteroskopie gleichwertige Untersuchungsmethode anzusehen[9].…”

unclassified

Rationelle Diagnostik in der gynäkologischen Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin – Teil 2: Besondere Aspekte der Sterilitätsdiagnostik

Müller¹,

Dittrich²,

Reißmann³

et al. 2009

Geburtsh Frauenheilk

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review

Chan¹,

Jayaprakasan²,

Zamora³

et al. 2011

Human Reproduction Update

622

372

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUNDThe prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in high-risk women is unclear, as several different diagnostic approaches have been applied to different groups of patients. This review aims to evaluate the prevalence of such anomalies in unselected populations and in women with infertility, including those undergoing IVF treatment, women with a history of miscarriage, women with infertility and recurrent miscarriage combined, and women with a history of preterm delivery.METHODSSearches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane register were performed. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Studies were grouped into those that used ‘optimal’ and ‘suboptimal’ tests for uterine anomalies. Meta-analyses were performed to establish the prevalence of uterine anomalies and their subtypes within the various populations.RESULTSWe identified 94 observational studies comprising 89 861 women. The prevalence of uterine anomalies diagnosed by optimal tests was 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5–8.5] in the unselected population, 8.0% (95% CI, 5.3–12) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI, 8.9–20.0) in those with a history of miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI, 18.3–32.8) in those with miscarriage and infertility. Arcuate uterus is most common in the unselected population (3.9%; 95% CI, 2.1–7.1), and its prevalence is not increased in high-risk groups. In contrast, septate uterus is the most common anomaly in high-risk populations.CONCLUSIONSWomen with a history of miscarriage or miscarriage and infertility have higher prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies compared with the unselected population.

show abstract

3D ultrasound vs Sonohysterography for the diagnosis of uterine anomalies: A prospective blinded study of 1000 consecutive women

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Endometrial thickness assessment at embryo transfer in ICSI cycles using GnRH antagonists

Endometrial thickness assessment at embryo transfer in ICSI cycles using GnRH antagonists

Rationelle Diagnostik in der gynäkologischen Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin – Teil 2: Besondere Aspekte der Sterilitätsdiagnostik

The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About