Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2005.1520204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D vehicle sensor based on monocular vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these illustrations, (a), (b) and (c) columns show results by using three different, but constant, horizon line positions, while (d) column depicts the corresponding results obtained by using a horizon line position automatically computed by the proposed technique. Following the algorithm presented in (Ponsa et al, 2005), a 3D grid, sampling the road plane, is projected on the 2D image. The projected grid nodes are used as references to define the bottom-left corners of pedestrian sized searching windows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In these illustrations, (a), (b) and (c) columns show results by using three different, but constant, horizon line positions, while (d) column depicts the corresponding results obtained by using a horizon line position automatically computed by the proposed technique. Following the algorithm presented in (Ponsa et al, 2005), a 3D grid, sampling the road plane, is projected on the 2D image. The projected grid nodes are used as references to define the bottom-left corners of pedestrian sized searching windows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, monocular systems are used on an offline pose estimation basis. To this end, the car should be at rest and should face a flat road; once the camera pose is estimated its values are assumed to keep constant, or vary within a predefined range, during the on-line process (e.g., Ponsa et al, 2005;Bertozzi et al, 2003b). Although useful in most of highway scenarios, constant camera position and orientation is not a valid assumption to be used in urban scenarios since in general, vehicle pose is easily affected by road imperfections or artifacts (e.g., rough road, speed bumps), car's accelerations, uphill/downhill driving, to mention a few.…”
Section: Previous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After crossing AOIs have been recognized by crossing classifier, HOG based pedestrian detection (Dalal, 2005) and Haar-like vehicle detection (Ponsa, 2005 andKim, 2012) The progressive increase and then sharp decrease of the ordinate in Chart 12(a) lie in that, in sequence image, the width of a crossing in images progressive increases as it becomes closer, and sharply decreases until it disappears.…”
Section: Automatic Selection Of Appropriate Images For Defilement Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…www.intechopen.com  Form recognition and classification: The form recognition allows finding a certain object from the raw data in order to classify it and to take a decision; this can be to stop your camera-equipped car when an obstacle is detected (Ponsa and al., 2005). This method is based on two different steps: firstly, the system needs to learn what kind of object it has to detect.…”
Section: Algorithms Used For Diagnosis Helpingmentioning
confidence: 99%