2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2011.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D visualization of subdural electrode shift as measured at craniotomy reopening

Abstract: Summary Purpose Subdural electrodes are implanted for recording intracranial EEG (iEEG) in cases of medically refractory epilepsy as a means to locate cortical regions of seizure onset amenable to surgical resection. Without the aid of imaging-derived 3D electrode models for surgical planning, surgeons have relied on electrodes remaining stationary from the time between placement and follow-up resection. This study quantifies electrode shift with respect to the cortical surface occurring between electrode pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
31
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In all patients, intraoperative pictures were taken with a digital camera before dural closure as well as after re-opening, to confirm the spatial accuracy of electrode display on the 3D brain surface reconstructed from MRI (Nagasawa et al, 2011; Wu et al, 2011). Nonetheless, a minor spatial error in coregistration of MRI and subdural electrodes (LaViolette et al, 2011) could not be ruled out in non-visualized occipital regions in some patients in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In all patients, intraoperative pictures were taken with a digital camera before dural closure as well as after re-opening, to confirm the spatial accuracy of electrode display on the 3D brain surface reconstructed from MRI (Nagasawa et al, 2011; Wu et al, 2011). Nonetheless, a minor spatial error in coregistration of MRI and subdural electrodes (LaViolette et al, 2011) could not be ruled out in non-visualized occipital regions in some patients in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Several methods have been developed to localize the implanted electrodes in relation to cortical surface structures, including those based on digital photography (Mahvash et al, 2007; Wellmer et al, 2002), X-ray radiographs (Miller et al, 2007, 2010), computerized tomography (CT) (Dykstra et al, 2011; Grzeszczuk et al, 1992; Hermes et al, 2010; Hunter et al, 2005; LaViolette et al, 2011a; Morris et al, 2004; Sebastiano et al, 2006; Tao et al, 2009; Wang et al, 2005; Winkler et al, 2000), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Bootsveld et al, 1994; Kovalev et al, 2005; Morris et al, 2004; Schulze-Bonhage et al, 2002), and multiple image sets (Dalal et al, 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subdural grid and strip electrodes are more prone to suboptimal positioning since they are sometimes passed through a bur hole or beyond craniotomy edges. 10 Accurate placement of invasive EEG electrodes is important for correctly identifying a seizure onset zone that may be appropriate for resection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%