2009
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.a0820430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D wind-induced response analysis of a cable-membrane structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nonlinear geometric characteristics of such a flexible membrane structure should be considered. The result is consistent with the previous researches [22,23]; this finding indicates that the results in the present study are reliable, and the structural model, as well as the wind load time history, can be used for analysis.…”
Section: Coefficient Of Dynamic Amplificationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The nonlinear geometric characteristics of such a flexible membrane structure should be considered. The result is consistent with the previous researches [22,23]; this finding indicates that the results in the present study are reliable, and the structural model, as well as the wind load time history, can be used for analysis.…”
Section: Coefficient Of Dynamic Amplificationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Next to these experimental studies, numerical investigations using CFD have been performed for double curved membrane roof structures. Some pressure distributions are shown for hypars [14] [20] and umbrella-like cones [21] [22]. However, most of the numerical studies focus rather on the dynamics of these structures including fluid structure interaction coupling frameworks [22]- [26] and vibrations analyses [27].…”
Section: Wind Loads On Double Curved Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the shape-finding analysis of cable-supported structures in the construction process mostly focuses on conventional planar, folded, circular, elliptical or parallel shapes, and many theories and methods have been proposed, e.g., a dynamic relaxation method by Motro et al [ 17 ], a force-density method by Schek [ 18 ], a nonlinear force method by Luo and Shen [ 19 ], a nonlinear force density method by Koohestani [ 20 ], a nonlinear dynamic finite element method by Ding et al [ 21 ], a double singular value decomposition method without changing the predefined shape by Zhou et al [ 22 ], a catenary equation-based component force balancing method by Jiang et al [ 23 ], and a novel machine learning approach by Du et al [ 24 ]. By solving the noncompatibility problem between cable and beam elements, Nie et al [ 25 ] coupled the cable network and supporting frame to accurately model the real equilibrium state in an optimization model and derived the linear form for the determination of the free node coordinates from systematic equilibrium equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%