2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3fgl Demographics Outside the Galactic Plane Using Supervised Machine Learning: Pulsar and Dark Matter Subhalo Interpretations

Abstract: Nearly one-third of the sources listed in the Third Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) catalog (3FGL) remain unassociated. It is possible that predicted and even unanticipated gamma-ray source classes are present in these data waiting to be discovered. Taking advantage of the excellent spectral capabilities achieved by the Fermi LAT, we use machine-learning classifiers (Random Forest and XGBoost) to pinpoint potentially novel source classes in the unassociated 3FGL sample outside the Galactic plane. Here we repo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using machine learning algorithms, Mirabal et al (2016) classified 3FGL J0838.8−2829 as a high-confidence pulsar based on its γ-ray spectral shape and variability index. Accordingly, we propose XMMU J083850.38−282756.8 as the millisecond pulsar counterpart of 3FGL J0838.8−2829.…”
Section: Xmm-newton Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using machine learning algorithms, Mirabal et al (2016) classified 3FGL J0838.8−2829 as a high-confidence pulsar based on its γ-ray spectral shape and variability index. Accordingly, we propose XMMU J083850.38−282756.8 as the millisecond pulsar counterpart of 3FGL J0838.8−2829.…”
Section: Xmm-newton Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another machine learning work [81] used a similar algorithm but for pulsars instead of AGNs. In this case, it is not possible to discard the obtained pulsar candidates, as they have a spectrum compatible with DM annihilation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, Ackermann, M. et al (2012); Lee et al (2012); Hassan et al (2013); Doert & Errando (2014); Chiaro et al (2016); Mirabal et al (2016); Saz Parkinson et al (2016); Lefaucheur & Pita (2017); Salvetti et al (2017) and other authors, have explored the application of MLT classifying undetermined γ-ray sources in Fermi-LAT γ-ray source catalogs. The first study was applied to the 1-year Source Catalog 1FGL (Abdo et al 2010), the next 3 studies to the 2-year Source Catalog 2FGL (Nolan et al 2012) and the rest were applied to the 4-year Source Catalog 3FGL (Acero et al 2015).…”
Section: Machine Learning Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%