2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40846-021-00620-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3PCNNB-Net: Three Parallel CNN Branches for Breast Cancer Classification Through Histopathological Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… SVM classifier is used. Accuracy between 93.62 and 96.99% [ 29 ] 2021 BreakHis ( ) Three parallel CNN branches with deep resudial blocks (3PCNNB-Net) are used to extract features. The features extracted using three CNN layers are fused using average technique.…”
Section: Review Of Recent Deep Learning Research Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… SVM classifier is used. Accuracy between 93.62 and 96.99% [ 29 ] 2021 BreakHis ( ) Three parallel CNN branches with deep resudial blocks (3PCNNB-Net) are used to extract features. The features extracted using three CNN layers are fused using average technique.…”
Section: Review Of Recent Deep Learning Research Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ibraheem et al [ 24 ] proposed a three-parallel CNN branch network (3PCNNB-Net) to classify breast cancer. The 3PCNNB-Net was separated into three steps.…”
Section: Application Of Cnn In Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies used deeper neural networks on the two-class problem of breast cancer histopathological images, and achieved accuracy of more than 90 % on the BreakHis dataset [ 13 , 20 , 21 ]. Furthermore, the authors built the model from the perspective of increasing network width and achieved good performance [ 22 , 23 ]. Inception-ResNet considered scaling factors between 0.1 and 0.3 to scale the entire parallel convolution module (Inception), which effectively improved the model performance [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies resized the images to small sizes for training, but this approach inevitably damaged the image quality [ 22 , 30 , 31 ]. There are also studies cut images into patches and use voting algorithms to calculate the prediction results of the images [ 20 , 21 , 32 , 33 ], however, since the cut patches may not contain cancer cells, this can lead to bias in the voting result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%