For a long time, the urological community has been on a quest to find the best means for early detection of prostate cancer (PC). An important milestone was the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-testing. While initial results regarding a structured screening were controversial, with longer follow-up of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial [1] and more detailed assessment of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening (PLCO) trial [2,3] the advantage is increasingly evident, with the number needed to screen dropping below the levels of the widely accepted breast cancer screening [4]. A variety of markers have since been introduced with improved "sensitivity" and specificity, but low availability and high cost have prevented their wide