1998
DOI: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.1998.tb00057.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4.3.2 An Information Model for Integrating Product Development Processes

Abstract: This paper describes some of the work products used or generated during the development of a softwareintensive system by integrated product teams (IPTs) working on the system elements. An information modeling approach represents the relationships among the information entities involved in the system-level management, design, verification, integration, and testing activities: the model has been extended to the subsystem, configuration item, and component levels. The purpose of the information model is to provid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, there is work being performed within the INCOSE working groups (see the document Requirements for an Integrated Systems Engineering Environment, produced by the Tools Integration and Interoperability Working Group and available via www.incose.org/cmtes/tiiwg.html, and Jones et al, 1997, from the Requirements Working Group). There is also relevant work reported in groups outside INCOSE, such as the Software Productivity Consortium that may be relevant (Lykins et al 1998). Clearly other relevant areas of work will also emerge from the AP-233 working group attendees experiences.…”
Section: Future Work and Ap-233 Developmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, there is work being performed within the INCOSE working groups (see the document Requirements for an Integrated Systems Engineering Environment, produced by the Tools Integration and Interoperability Working Group and available via www.incose.org/cmtes/tiiwg.html, and Jones et al, 1997, from the Requirements Working Group). There is also relevant work reported in groups outside INCOSE, such as the Software Productivity Consortium that may be relevant (Lykins et al 1998). Clearly other relevant areas of work will also emerge from the AP-233 working group attendees experiences.…”
Section: Future Work and Ap-233 Developmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Work in other areas outside the STEP community is also important, and needs to be considered. (Lykins et al 1998). Clearly other relevant areas of work will also emerge from the AP-233 working group attendees experiences.…”
Section: Future Work and Ap-233 Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IPPD is a methodology that reflects a systems approach in the development of products, but it is only effective when the IPTs are linked by Cross Product Teams to effect integration, and when the people are committed to the process (Dube, 1998). The problem of poor communication is the major potential weakness in the IPPD approach, with the problem of interteam communication, which relates to the quality of system integration, being the most serious (Lykins et al, 1998). One strategy to assist effective IPT operation is the commencement of teams with a short team building course (Wilson et al, 1998).…”
Section: (All Us Authors)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strategy is to provide IPTs with some training in SE process, in order that they will appreciate the context in which they work, and contribute in the correct way (Topf and Bellagamba, 1998). The solution to the communication problem presented by Lykins et al (1998) was to develop an Object Oriented model of information to form the framework of communication between IPTs in the project. Brezinski (1998) asserts that IPTs are a good organizational approach, but that in matrix organizations this results in dual reporting structures, which is very difficult.…”
Section: (All Us Authors)mentioning
confidence: 99%