eThe antiretroviral protease inhibitors (APIs) ritonavir, saquinavir, and lopinavir, used to treat HIV infection, inhibit the growth of Plasmodium falciparum at clinically relevant concentrations. Moreover, it has been reported that these APIs potentiate the activity of chloroquine (CQ) against this parasite in vitro. The mechanism underlying this effect is not understood, but the degree of chemosensitization varies between the different APIs and, with the exception of ritonavir, appears to be dependent on the parasite exhibiting a CQ-resistant phenotype. Here we report a study of the role of the P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter (PfCRT) in the interaction between CQ and APIs, using transgenic parasites expressing different PfCRT alleles and using the Xenopus laevis oocyte system for the heterologous expression of PfCRT. Our data demonstrate that saquinavir behaves as a CQ resistance reverser and that this explains, at least in part, its ability to enhance the effects of CQ in CQ-resistant P. falciparum parasites.
Certain antiretroviral protease inhibitors (APIs) inhibit the growth of malaria parasites at clinically relevant concentrations (2,21,23,25,32). This observation may have clinically significant implications for the treatment of HIV-and malaria parasite-coinfected patients as well as for the development of a potent class of antimalarial agents possessing a novel mode of action. While detailed clinical trials are required to determine whether the antiplasmodial activity of the APIs is beneficial in a coinfection setting, reports that these drugs act synergistically with selected antimalarial drugs both in vitro and in vivo (13,14,31) are promising, and further studies are clearly warranted.Initial studies demonstrated that chloroquine (CQ) acts synergistically with the APIs ritonavir (RTV) and saquinavir (SQV) against CQ-resistant Plasmodium falciparum parasites (31). These findings were confirmed and extended by the observation that CQ also acts synergistically with lopinavir (LPV), nelfinavir, and atazanavir against CQ-resistant P. falciparum (14). However, analysis of the activity of CQ-API combinations against CQ-sensitive P. falciparum parasites revealed that (i) the degree of synergy varies among the APIs, with RTV showing the greatest degree of synergism; (ii) the synergistic effect of RTV on CQ activity against CQ-resistant P. falciparum parasites is greater than that measured against CQ-sensitive parasites; and (iii) although LPV, SQV, nelfinavir, and atazanavir behave synergistically with CQ against CQ-resistant P. falciparum parasites, these combinations are additive when assessed with CQ-sensitive parasites (14).The mechanism underlying the different effects of CQ-API combinations against CQ-resistant parasites compared to CQsensitive parasites is not well understood, but one plausible explanation is that the APIs may act as CQ resistance reversers in P. falciparum. The primary determinant of CQ resistance in P. falciparum is mutation of the CQ resistance transporter (PfCRT) (5...