2023
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-bsbmj
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[4]Helicenium Ion as Bipolar Redox Material for Symmetrical Fully Organic Pole-less Redox Flow Battery

Jules Moutet,
David Mills,
Diego Lozier
et al.

Abstract: Long duration storage batteries such as Redox Flow Batteries (RFBs) are promising storage system to address the energy storage requirement that our society will require in the years to come. Recent effort has been focused on the development of metal free and high energy density system such as all-organic non-aqueous redox flow batteries (NAORFBs). However high-voltage NAORFBs currently use distinct anolytes and catholytes, which are separated by a membrane sensitive to osmotic pressure. This configuration resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of previously reported catholyte scaffolds, including TEMPO derivatives, dialkoxybenzenes, ferrocenes, phenothiazines, and phenazines, as shown in Figure a, exhibit oxidation potentials below 0.6 V vs Fc/Fc + . N-ORFB catholyte materials, which exhibit potentials above 0.8 V vs Fc/Fc + , however, are primarily limited to the cyclopropenium scaffolds developed by the Sanford group, [4]­helicinium scaffolds pioneered by the Gianetti group, and tetrathiafulvalene derivatives, which have seen use in hybrid Li/organic RFBs. , We therefore aimed at the outset of our research to expand the chemical space of these high-oxidation potential catholyte scaffolds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of previously reported catholyte scaffolds, including TEMPO derivatives, dialkoxybenzenes, ferrocenes, phenothiazines, and phenazines, as shown in Figure a, exhibit oxidation potentials below 0.6 V vs Fc/Fc + . N-ORFB catholyte materials, which exhibit potentials above 0.8 V vs Fc/Fc + , however, are primarily limited to the cyclopropenium scaffolds developed by the Sanford group, [4]­helicinium scaffolds pioneered by the Gianetti group, and tetrathiafulvalene derivatives, which have seen use in hybrid Li/organic RFBs. , We therefore aimed at the outset of our research to expand the chemical space of these high-oxidation potential catholyte scaffolds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%