“…The majority of previously reported catholyte scaffolds, including TEMPO derivatives, dialkoxybenzenes, ferrocenes, phenothiazines, and phenazines, as shown in Figure a, exhibit oxidation potentials below 0.6 V vs Fc/Fc + . − N-ORFB catholyte materials, which exhibit potentials above 0.8 V vs Fc/Fc + , however, are primarily limited to the cyclopropenium scaffolds developed by the Sanford group, [4]helicinium scaffolds pioneered by the Gianetti group, and tetrathiafulvalene derivatives, which have seen use in hybrid Li/organic RFBs. ,− We therefore aimed at the outset of our research to expand the chemical space of these high-oxidation potential catholyte scaffolds.…”