4 Motorische ontwikkeling

Netelenbos, J. B.; Maas, R. A. H. M.; Duiser, Ivonne H. F.

doi:10.1007/978-90-368-1592-5_10

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Measurement kits are used for CP patients to quantify efficient functioning as a standard expressive evaluation, choose management areas, and assess consequences [14]. Progressing concern in the research extents to advance and usage highly reliable, valid, and consistent implements as effective measures, and their correlation with each other is considered significant for evidence-based research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Progressing concern in the research extents to advance and usage highly reliable, valid, and consistent implements as effective measures, and their correlation with each other is considered significant for evidence-based research. The principal aim of this cross-sectional study is to find the relationship between the clinical measurement scales for gross motor function in young CP children [15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Correlation between clinical measurement scales on gross motor function in children with spastic cerebral palsy

Reffat,

AL-Nemr

2024

Egypt Pediatric Association Gaz

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Children with cerebral palsy (CP) may have different gross motor impairments which in sequence affecting their life occupations. The purpose of the study is to investigate the correlation between Gross Motor Function Measurement-66 (GMFM-66), the test of Bruininks-Oseretsky Motor Proficiency (BOTMP), and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale–Second Edition (PDMS-2) in young children with CP. Methods A correlational study was applied on 50 children aged from 4 to 6 years (30 girls, 20 boys) with spastic CP. Results The Pearson correlation coefficient between the GMFM scale and PDMS-2 motor quotients, and its subscales (stationary, locomotion, and object control) and also between GMFM and BOTMP gross motor quotients and its subscales (strength, agility, and body coordination) were statistically significant. Spearman’s coefficients between the grade of the Gross Motor Classification System (GMFCS) and the PDMS-2 Gross Motor Composite, BOTS-2, and its subscale results were also statistically significant. Conclusion The three measurement scales, GMFM- 66, BOTS-2, and PDMS-2, are significantly related. Therefore, GMFCS is useful in predicting movement performance in children with CP and correlated with predictive guidance in treatment development. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06124352.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%