2010
DOI: 10.1177/000313481007600207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

40-Slice Multidetector CT: Is MRI Still Necessary for Cervical Spine Clearance after Blunt Trauma?

Abstract: We have recently demonstrated that 16-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) is insufficient for cervical spine (CS) clearance in patients with unreliable examinations after blunt trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine if a negative CS CT using 40-slice MDCT is sufficient for ruling out CS injury in unreliable blunt trauma patients or if MRI remains necessary for definitive clearance. In addition, we sought to elucidate the frequency by which MRI alters treatment in patients with a negative CS CT who have a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a GCS score of 13 or less on initial presentation to define obtunded patients. Similar studies have used a GCS of 13 or less, 6 15 or a GCS score of 14 or less 9 11 16 17 to describe patients who are obtunded or unreliable for examination. Intoxicated patients were deemed as such if they either had a recent history of ingestion of an intoxicating agent, evidence on examination or via positive laboratory testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a GCS score of 13 or less on initial presentation to define obtunded patients. Similar studies have used a GCS of 13 or less, 6 15 or a GCS score of 14 or less 9 11 16 17 to describe patients who are obtunded or unreliable for examination. Intoxicated patients were deemed as such if they either had a recent history of ingestion of an intoxicating agent, evidence on examination or via positive laboratory testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to Como et al., Menaker et al. conducted two retrospective studies comparing the use of CT and MRI to clear the CS in obtunded patients and found that MRI CS identified 8.9% 9 and 24.4% 10 abnormal findings in spite of negative CT reports. Based on these findings, some of these patients required operative management or remained in cervical collar for an extended time period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that MRI should be used routinely for cervical spine clearance in patients who are unable to participate in clinical assessment. Further work conducted by Menaker et al 41 found that 15.6% of a study subset of 96 unreliable patients had injury detected on MRI after negative 40 slice CT imaging, including spinal cord compression requiring operative management. The authors concluded that modern, multislice CT imaging was still inadequate for definitive spinal clearance in patients unable to be clinically assessed.…”
Section: Cervical Spine Clearance In Unconscious Patientsmentioning
confidence: 97%