2020
DOI: 10.1080/03906701.2020.1853005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

40 years of Luhmann's legacy in the Anglophone academic community: a quantitative content analysis of Luhmannian research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Luhmann's theory has offered epistemologically solid perspectives of seeing the world, while practically guiding research for describing and theorizing society. According to a recent quantitative content analysis of Luhmannian research published in English-language academic journals, 62.3 % of the articles printed in the 2010s adopted Luhmann's theory as guiding frameworks, thus demonstrating the instrumental potential for the theory that can lead to fruitful research streams (Sohn, 2020). However, his theoretical approaches have been adopted by researchers under the umbrella term of systems theory without proper labeling or discernment, mainly due to the lack of literature that systematically classifies the full gamut of Luhmann's theoretical-methodological constructs.…”
Section: Describedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Luhmann's theory has offered epistemologically solid perspectives of seeing the world, while practically guiding research for describing and theorizing society. According to a recent quantitative content analysis of Luhmannian research published in English-language academic journals, 62.3 % of the articles printed in the 2010s adopted Luhmann's theory as guiding frameworks, thus demonstrating the instrumental potential for the theory that can lead to fruitful research streams (Sohn, 2020). However, his theoretical approaches have been adopted by researchers under the umbrella term of systems theory without proper labeling or discernment, mainly due to the lack of literature that systematically classifies the full gamut of Luhmann's theoretical-methodological constructs.…”
Section: Describedmentioning
confidence: 99%