2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(02)01154-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

40Ar/39Ar dating of the Rajahmundry Traps, Eastern India and their relationship to the Deccan Traps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
132
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(following the terminology of Knight et al, 2003, where a plateau comprises five or more successive heating steps not showing a resolvable slope, representing >50% of the total released 39 Ar, and concordant within 2-σ errors) at 19.15± 0.18 Ma (Zaruma; Fig. 10a) and 10.6±0.3 Ma (Chaucha; Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(following the terminology of Knight et al, 2003, where a plateau comprises five or more successive heating steps not showing a resolvable slope, representing >50% of the total released 39 Ar, and concordant within 2-σ errors) at 19.15± 0.18 Ma (Zaruma; Fig. 10a) and 10.6±0.3 Ma (Chaucha; Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…66 Ma, but possibly over a time range as large as 69-64 Ma. Within these ages, if we discount results of Venkatesan et al (1993) for the Poladpur and Ambenali Formations, which appear to be biased by 39 Ar recoil artifacts, in favor of the more reliable ages from Knight et al (2003) and Hooper et al (2010), the Wai Subgroup ages are consistent with eruption at or just following CretaceousPaleogene boundary time. The Lonavala Subgroup formations have not been dated yet, and the Kalsubai Formations are only poorly constrained, but presumably were erupted before Cretaceous-Paleogene time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Ar plateau ages for lavas in the Western Ghats that are assigned to specifi c formations, published since the year 1990, along with 2σ error bars (Venkatesan et al, 1993;Hofmann et al, 2000;Knight et al, 2003;Pande et al, 2004;Hooper et al, 2010). All ages have been recalculated per the calibration of Renne et al (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rao and Lakshmi [144] confirmed that most of a 338-m-long core from a borehole near the southeastern boundary of the traps had reversed magnetization and was likely coeval with the C29r age of the bulk of the Mahabaleshwar sections. Even farther from the main sections of the western Ghats, lavas of the Rajahmundry Traps on the eastern coast of India, chemically identical to the Poladpur and Ambenali formations, have recently [96] been dated by 40 Ar/ 39 Ar as being indistinguish-able from these formations. Thus, the original extent of Deccan magmatism is even significantly larger than commonly believed.…”
Section: The Deccan Trapsmentioning
confidence: 99%