2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(07)60409-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

411 the ‘True’ Cost of Robotic Prostatectomy in a Taxation Based Healthcare System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With no current data exploring cost, quality of life or well‐defined outcome data from robotic‐assisted upper gastrointestinal oncological resection, any cost analysis presented can at the current time only be a guess. Estimates from the cost data acquired from the radical prostatectomy, however, has placed the robotic‐assisted laparoscopic technique as being over £2000 pounds more expensive than the laparoscopic and £3000 more than the open technique 28,31–34 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With no current data exploring cost, quality of life or well‐defined outcome data from robotic‐assisted upper gastrointestinal oncological resection, any cost analysis presented can at the current time only be a guess. Estimates from the cost data acquired from the radical prostatectomy, however, has placed the robotic‐assisted laparoscopic technique as being over £2000 pounds more expensive than the laparoscopic and £3000 more than the open technique 28,31–34 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates from the cost data acquired from the radical prostatectomy, however, has placed the robotic-assisted laparoscopic technique as being over £2000 pounds more expensive than the laparoscopic and £3000 more than the open technique. 28,[31][32][33][34] Despite these confounding limitations, the evidence for the benefit of the robot as a platform from which novice laparoscopists can offer a minimally invasive surgical procedure promoting all the operative benefits to the patients is building. Learning curves for minimally invasive upper gastrointestinal are poorly defined at best 35,36 with no learning curve data for robotic upper gastrointestinal oncological procedures currently defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consultants wishing to start using a new procedure on the scale of LRP in the UK are required to obtain approval from the local Although LRP will still be slightly more expensive than open surgery, it can be shown to be cost efficient over the adjusted national tariff [6]. It might be more difficult to build a realistic business case for using robotic LRP, given the large overheads and running costs involved; however, the relative ease of learning the procedure might obviate some of the issues raised above.…”
Section: Clinical Governancementioning
confidence: 99%