2018
DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky073.415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

418 Economics of Creep Feeding a Spring Calving Beef Herd in the Nebraska Sandhills.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional costs associated with creep feeding equipment and labor were not factored into the analysis, which would further erode any potential financial benefit of creep feeding to a meat goat enterprise. Broadhead et al (2018) reported that although creep feeding increased calf weaning weights, the added costs of creep feeding (feed, labor, equipment, etc.) resulted in a loss of $71.05/calf marketed for creep-fed calves compared with noncreep-fed calves over 3 yr.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional costs associated with creep feeding equipment and labor were not factored into the analysis, which would further erode any potential financial benefit of creep feeding to a meat goat enterprise. Broadhead et al (2018) reported that although creep feeding increased calf weaning weights, the added costs of creep feeding (feed, labor, equipment, etc.) resulted in a loss of $71.05/calf marketed for creep-fed calves compared with noncreep-fed calves over 3 yr.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal behavior has been associated with memory ability, in which positive and frequent human–animal interaction could positively impact future behavioral responses ( Boivin et al, 2009 ). The creep feeding system and additional phenotypic measurement (e.g., ultrasound information) are generally associated with additional interaction with humans ( Broadhead et al, 2018 ). A temperament study in Angus cows in Bulgaria reported that more docile cows have frequent contact with people ( Karamfilov, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%