Untitled

Jacobs, Jerry A.; Labov, Teresa

doi:10.1023/a:1021029507937

Cited by 99 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Il est aussi largement constaté que, comme résultat d'un ordre social clairement patriarcal, les hommes sont généralement plus exogames que les femmes; et que les hommes qui appartiennent à des minorités immigrantes ou ethniques tendent davantage à se mettre en couple en dehors des règles de leur groupe d'appartenance (union exogame) que les femmes (Hwang et al, 1997;Qian, 1997;Jacobs et Labov, 2002;Lee et Edmonston, 2005). Les populations asiatiques en seraient l'exception, pour qui la tendance est inverse (plus grande exogamie chez les femmes).…”

Section: Le Sexe/genreunclassified

Considérations théoricométhodologiques autour de la mixité

García

2013

efg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cet article propose quelques considérations théoricométhodologiques autour de la mixité. Il cherche à mettre en évidence les limites, les pièges et les dérives de la littérature existante en ce qui a trait à la conceptualisation de la notion de mixité. Après une contextualisation initiale (définition, variables et modèles liés au phénomène de la mixité), il s'agira d'indiquer les différents niveaux clés de complexité théorique et méthodologique du phénomène afin d'éviter les visions simplistes ou réductrices. Nous nous interrogerons donc sur la clarté de la notion d’« union mixte », l'équivalence entre mixité et intégration sociale, et nous soulignerons la complexité inhérente aux processus de configuration de l'identité ethnique résultante.This article offers some theoretical-methodological considerations concerning 'mixedness'. It seeks to highlight the limits, pitfalls and derivatives of current literature with respect to the conceptualization of 'mixedness'. After a preliminary contextualisation (definition, variables and main patterns linked to the phenomenon of 'mixedness', endogamy and exogamy), the aim will be to draw attention to the different key levels of theoretical and methodological complexity of the phenomenon, with the purpose of avoiding simplistic or restrictive analyses. We will therefore put into question the clarity of the notion of “mixed union”, the direct equation between hybridity and social integration, and will emphasize the inherent complexity of the processes of configuration of the resulting (mixed) ethnic identity

show abstract

Section: Le Sexe/genreunclassified

Considérations théoricométhodologiques autour de la mixité

García

2013

efg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We think that the gender difference reflects to a large extent the effect of compulsory military service during the post-war decades, which Estonian men were usually sent to perform in other regions of the former Soviet Union. An important effect of military service and veteran status on mixed partnership formation has been previously reported in American studies (Jacobs and Labov 2002;Fryer 2007). 18 In additional models controlling for migration history rendered the effect of opportunity structure insignificant.…”

Section: Partnership Formation Among the Majority Populationmentioning

confidence: 57%

The formation of ethnically mixed partnerships in Estonia: A stalling trend from a two-sided perspective

Rahnu¹,

Puur²,

Klesment³

et al. 2018

DemRes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Most studies, drawing on a variety of data sources (e.g., U.S. Census, population-based surveys, studies with convenience or judgment samples), use racial or panethnic groups (rather than the more specific categories of ethnicity and nationality) to identify relationship type (e.g., cross-vs. same-panethnic romantic relationships; Feliciano, Robnett, & Komaie, 2009;Fu & Wolfinger, 2011;Herman & Campbell, 2012;Jacobs & Labov, 2002;Keels & Harris, 2014;Levin, Taylor, & Caudle, 2007;Perry, 2014;Tucker & Mitchell-Kernan, 1995;Wang, 2012).…”

Section: Defining Cross-panethnic Romantic Relationshipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

50 Years of Loving: Interracial Romantic Relationships and Recommendations for Future Research

Guzman

Nishina

2017

J of Family Theo & Revie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In honor of the 50th anniversary of Loving v. Virginia (1967), the landmark civil rights case that invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage in the United States, this review describes the field's past and future directions for studying interracial romantic relationships. We briefly present history, theories, and research about interracial and interethnic romantic relationships, and provide suggestions for future research. We also highlight the need for flexible racial and ethnic categories as demographics and distinctions shift in the United States by proposing the use of adaptable panethnic (a set of related ethnic groups that have been combined and collectively labeled) categories, rather than racial categories, or the use of more specific ethnic or nationality categories depending on a variety of factors. Finally, we discuss multiracial and multiethnic individuals in the research on romantic relationships, acknowledging that multiracial and multiethnic individuals are both the offspring of such unions and a rapidly growing demographic.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 99 publications

References 42 publications

Considérations théoricométhodologiques autour de la mixité

Considérations théoricométhodologiques autour de la mixité

The formation of ethnically mixed partnerships in Estonia: A stalling trend from a two-sided perspective

50 Years of Loving: Interracial Romantic Relationships and Recommendations for Future Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About