1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02132.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

45‐Hour continuous quintuple‐site actimetry: Relations between trunk and limb movements and effects of circadian sleep‐wake rhythmicity

Abstract: Diurnal and nocturnal trunk and limb motor activity of 20 healthy individuals was evaluated by actimetry for 45 consecutive hours. Sleep was assessed by sleep logs. Overall, motor activity significantly (p < .05) decreased in the order wrist, ankle, and trunk. There was significantly more motor activity in the dominant wrist during the diurnal period. Motor activity was significantly affected by the 24-hr sleep-wake cycle, with lower levels and prolonged immobility during the night. Time series analyses reveal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation might be the different placement of the actigraph (chest instead of wrist) for sensor integration reasons. Studies on different actigraph placements reported differences in actigraphy performance, which supports this hypothesis [18], [19]. Architecture A1 (diamond), which is using ECG and respiration signals is clearly better than A5 in detecting sleep and wake states.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…One explanation might be the different placement of the actigraph (chest instead of wrist) for sensor integration reasons. Studies on different actigraph placements reported differences in actigraphy performance, which supports this hypothesis [18], [19]. Architecture A1 (diamond), which is using ECG and respiration signals is clearly better than A5 in detecting sleep and wake states.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This site was chosen because the results of previous research have shown that motor activity measured at the dominant wrist is the most appropriate 22 and also correlates best with general physical activity. 23 The internal clock of the ambulatory BP monitor was set on the same computer.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actigraphs are usually worn around the wrist to assess sleep, and around the waist/ trunk to assess physical activity [10,33,34], and the validation of the present sleep-scoring algorithm was conducted based on wrist-worn actigraphs [11]. However, good agreements between sleep/wake identifications and estimations of total sleep duration by wrist and waist actigraphy are reported [10,[35][36][37]. Due to the lack of sleep diaries, we had to rely solely on the researchers' identification of sleep based on the selected criteria, which probably has caused misscoring of sleep in some cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%