1972
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1972.tb02574.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

45, X/46, XY Chromosome Mosaic with Features of the Russell‐Silver Syndrome: a Case Report with a Review of the Literature

Abstract: SUMMARY A 45, X/46, XY chromosome mosaic is reported in a phenotypic boy fulfilling the criteria for the diagnosis of Russell‐Silver syndrome. Attention is drawn to the relationship between these conditions and congenital asymmetry, in that 45, X/46, XY mosaic and congenital asymmetries share an extremely high incidence of malignancies arising in the organs developing from the urogenital ridge. RÉSUMÉ Mosaique chromosomigue 45, X/46, XY et manifestations du syndrome de Russell‐Silver Une mosaique 45, X/46, XY… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, 50 were incompletely (1975) claimed they had 39 patients with SRS, but they described the physical findings of only eight in a previous paper (Tanner & Ham 1969)). Four cases were misdiagnosed, including a mother and daughter (Scott 1935, Gorlin & Meskin 1962, Vestermark 1970) (Case 2) and six had chromosomal abnormalities (Ferrier et al 1964, Hook & Yunis 1965, Tulinius et al 1972, Haslam et al 1973, Severi et al 1974, Chauvel et al 1975 1.3 %). The frequency of these malformations is so low that it is difficult to attribute any significance to them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 50 were incompletely (1975) claimed they had 39 patients with SRS, but they described the physical findings of only eight in a previous paper (Tanner & Ham 1969)). Four cases were misdiagnosed, including a mother and daughter (Scott 1935, Gorlin & Meskin 1962, Vestermark 1970) (Case 2) and six had chromosomal abnormalities (Ferrier et al 1964, Hook & Yunis 1965, Tulinius et al 1972, Haslam et al 1973, Severi et al 1974, Chauvel et al 1975 1.3 %). The frequency of these malformations is so low that it is difficult to attribute any significance to them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second pathology was considered at this point as the phenotype was not fully explained by the karyotype findings. In view of some overlapping features with Russell-Silver Syndrome [9] and as per recommendation [12], methylation testing, uniparental disomy and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) microarray analysis were performed; which turned out to be negative. Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) was not available locally and testing cost overseas was an issue.…”
Section: Case Historymentioning
confidence: 99%