2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/263253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

45,X/47,XXX Mosaicism and Short Stature

Abstract: We describe the case of a ten-year-old girl with short stature and 45,X/47,XXX genotype. She also suffered from vesicoureteric reflux and kidney dysfunction prior to having surgery on her ureters. Otherwise, she does not have any of the characteristics of Turner nor Triple X syndrome. It has been shown that this mosaic condition as well as other varieties creates a milder phenotype than typical Turner syndrome, which is what we mostly see in our patient. However, this patient is a special case, because she is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) are chromosome disorders caused by the loss or gain of one or more sex chromosomes, typically recognized to link with genetic diseases such as Turner syndrome (45,X), trisomy X (47,XXX), Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY) and Jacob syndrome (47,XYY). 1,2 Conventional methods for detecting chromosome aneuploidies require invasive procedures, including chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. The overall prevalence of SCAs in the general population is 0.19%, although these disorders are underdiagnosed and the specific genetic mechanisms underlying the phenotypes are poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) are chromosome disorders caused by the loss or gain of one or more sex chromosomes, typically recognized to link with genetic diseases such as Turner syndrome (45,X), trisomy X (47,XXX), Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY) and Jacob syndrome (47,XYY). 1,2 Conventional methods for detecting chromosome aneuploidies require invasive procedures, including chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. The overall prevalence of SCAs in the general population is 0.19%, although these disorders are underdiagnosed and the specific genetic mechanisms underlying the phenotypes are poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Chromosomal aneuploidies are one of the most serious types of birth defects. Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), trisomy 18 (Edward syndrome), trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome), and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) are known as the most common chromosomal aneuploidies (Everest et al, 2015). Fetal SCAs are caused by the presence of an abnormal number of sex chromosomes (X, or Y) in a cell, and 45,X (Turner syndrome); 47,XXX (Triple X syndrome); 47,XYY (Klinefelter syndrome); 47,XXY are among those recognized (Visootsak & Graham Jr, 2009).Recently, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal aneuploidies based on circulated fetal DNA in the maternal
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those not written in English or in which the relevant information was largely missing were excluded. Finally, 26 articles that described 45 patients were selected (Acharya, Jonsrud, van der Hagen, & Maltau, 2003;Akbas et al, 2009;Alves & Silva, 2012;Blair et al, 2001;Bouchlariotou et al, 2011;Eblen & Nakajima, 2003;Everest et al, 2015;Hadnott, Gould, Gharib, & Bondy, 2011;Hishimura-Yonemaru et al, 2017;Improda et al, 2012;Kivinen & Herva, 1980;Kristesashvili, Chipashvili, Jorbenadze, & Greydanus, 2012;Lim et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2013;Lunding et al, 2015;Maciejewska-Jeske, Czyzyk, & Meczekalski, 2015;Martin, Smith, Hughes, & Morrison, 2018;Mavridi et al, 2018;Palmer & Reichmann, 1976;Sahinturk et al, 2015;Saikia, Sarma, & Yadav, 2017;Sybert, 2002;Tauchmanova et al, 2001;Terao, Hashimoto, Nukina, Mannen, & Shinohara, 1996;Venkateshwari et al, 2012;Wang, Yang, Li, & Mu, 2015). Characteristics related to puberty, menstruation, fertility, ovarian function, and karyotypes of the previously reported patients and those of the present case are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%