2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(04)90463-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

463 Comparison of usefulness and accuracy of simple noninvasive models as predictors of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C (CHC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 This model also performed poorly in our database and was much less accurate in other reports. 10,18,22 Similarly, the AST-to-platelet ratio index, proposed recently to predict accurately (AUROC of 0.89-0.94) the presence of cirrhosis, 15 was derived in a study that included only 41 patients with cirrhosis, and was validated in some 33 but not all cohorts, 34 including our training set. Other models have included subjective variables that have not been validated by others 13 ; incorporated less readily available laboratory Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 This model also performed poorly in our database and was much less accurate in other reports. 10,18,22 Similarly, the AST-to-platelet ratio index, proposed recently to predict accurately (AUROC of 0.89-0.94) the presence of cirrhosis, 15 was derived in a study that included only 41 patients with cirrhosis, and was validated in some 33 but not all cohorts, 34 including our training set. Other models have included subjective variables that have not been validated by others 13 ; incorporated less readily available laboratory Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discriminatory value of this fibrosis index has been confirmed by some but not all investigators. 33,36,37 All models are hampered somewhat by the inherent inaccuracy of needle liver biopsies as the standard for assessing cirrhosis. The distribution of fibrosis is patchy, not uniform, and subject to sampling error, particularly in smaller and fragmented specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%